Local Property of Flasque Sheaves

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Property
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof that a sheaf ##\mathscr{F}## on a topological space ##X## is flasque if every restriction ##\mathscr{F}|_U## for an open cover ##\mathscr{U}## of ##X## is flasque. A sheaf is defined as flasque when the restriction map from ##\mathscr{G}(X)## to ##\mathscr{G}(U)## is surjective for all open subsets ##U## of ##X##. The proof employs Zorn's lemma to establish the surjectivity of the restriction map for the entire sheaf ##\mathscr{F}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sheaf theory and its definitions, particularly flasque sheaves.
  • Familiarity with topological spaces and open covers.
  • Knowledge of Zorn's lemma and its application in proofs.
  • Basic concepts of restriction maps in the context of sheaves.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and examples of flasque sheaves in detail.
  • Explore the application of Zorn's lemma in various mathematical contexts.
  • Learn about the implications of sheaf cohomology in algebraic topology.
  • Investigate the relationship between sheaves and other mathematical structures, such as presheaves.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, sheaf theory, and advanced topology, will benefit from this discussion.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Let ##X## be a topological space, and let ##\mathscr{F}## be a sheaf on ##X##. Show that if ##\mathscr{U}## is an open cover of ##X## such that the restriction ##\mathscr{F}|_U## is flasque for every ##U\in \mathscr{U}##, then ##\mathscr{F}## is flasque.

Note: A sheaf ##\mathscr{G}## on ##X## is flasque if for all open subsets ##U\subset X##, the restriction map ##\mathscr{G}(X) \to \mathscr{G}(U)## is surjective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
For this problem you will need to use Zorn's lemma.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Fix an open subset ##U_0\subset X## and an ##s\in \mathscr{F}(U_0)##. Let ##\Sigma## be the collection of all pairs ##(W,t)##, where ##W## is open in ##X## with ##W\supset U_0## and ##t\in \mathscr{F}(W)## such that ##t|_{U_0} = s##. Partially order ##\Sigma## by declaring ##(W,t) \le (W',t')## if ##U_0 \subset W \subset W'## and ##t'|_{W} = t##. Then ##\Sigma## is a nonempty inductive set, and by Zorn's lemma there is a maximal element ##(V,r)## of ##\Sigma##. Suppose ##V \neq X##. There is an ##x\in X\setminus V##; let ##U\in \mathscr{U}## be an open neighborhood of ##x##. Since ##\mathscr{F}|_U## is flasque, there is an ##\alpha \in \mathscr{F}(U)## such that ##\alpha|_{U\cap V} = r|_{U\cap V}##. The sheaf property produces a ##\beta\in \mathscr{F}(U\cap V)## such that ##\beta|_V = r##. The pair ##(U\cup V, \beta) > (V,r)## in ##\Sigma##, contradicting maximality of ##(V,r)##. Hence, ##V = X## and ##\mathscr{F}## is flasque.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K