Log Question - Relationship between two points on log function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving logarithmic functions, specifically focusing on finding log base 6 of 5 and estimating the number of digits in 15 raised to the power of 10. Participants are exploring the relationships between logarithmic values and their calculations using base 10 logarithms.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of the original poster's interpretation of the logarithmic expressions, particularly whether it should be log base 5 of 6 instead of log base 6 of 5. Others discuss the feasibility of estimating log base 6 of 5 with the provided logarithmic values of 2 and 3.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the logarithmic expressions. Some participants suggest using the given logarithmic values to derive necessary calculations, while others express skepticism about the ability to compute log base 6 of 5 with the provided information. A few participants have offered insights into logarithmic properties that could be relevant to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating constraints related to the information provided in the original post, particularly regarding the logarithmic values of 2 and 3. There is a notable emphasis on the need for clarity in the problem statement and the assumptions being made about the logarithmic relationships.

maplesyrup23
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi Physics Forums,

I understand that I usually need to show that I've attempted a question in order to get feedback, but I have absolutely no idea how to approach this one Calculus Log question.

Base = 10

log (2) = 0.301103, log (3) = 0.47715

a.) Find log base 6 (5)

b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10

I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.

As for b, think of log base 10 and how numbers are written in base 10. Like, for example, 145 = 1*10^2 + 4*10^1 + 5*10^0. Since you know that a*10^1 + b^10^0, where a and b are between 0 and 9 inclusive, will never sum with c*10^2 to make a number higher than 999. log base 10 of any number between 100 and 999 will truncate to 2. Likewise, the log of any number between 1000 to 9999 will truncate down to 3. See the pattern?
 
Last edited:
TylerH said:
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.

It is possible I am reading it wrong, I haven't seen it written like this before, look at the printscreen.

EDIT: Sorry about the size of the image.
 

Attachments

  • PhysicsForums.png
    PhysicsForums.png
    447 bytes · Views: 546
That's definitely log base 6 of 5. There may be a way to do it, but if there is, I don't know it.
 
TylerH said:
That's definitely log base 6 of 5. There may be a way to do it, but if there is, I don't know it.

Crap, thanks anyways.
 
TylerH said:
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.
That is not true.

recall logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
a.) Find log base 6 (5)
log6(5)=log10(5)/log10(6)

recall logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10
digits~log10(15^10)
 
I assumed it was to be done with the log10 of 2 and 3. To clarify, it is impossible to estimate log6(5) with log10(2) and log10(3), using algebraic means.
 
lurflurf said:
That is not true.

recall logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
a.) Find log base 6 (5)
log6(5)=log10(5)/log10(6)

recall logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10
digits~log10(15^10)

yeah Tyler was right. You're supposed to be using the given log values in the OP to do this question.

log 3 = 0.477,
and log 2 = 0.301
 
^No. Tyler said the given log values could not be used to do this question, but they can.

Try to rewrite each desired log ie log10(6), log10(5), log10(15) in terms of the given logs log10(2) = 0.301103, log10(3) = 0.47715, log10(10)=1 by using the familar rules
logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
logb(x/y)=logb(x)-logb(y)
logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
 
  • #10
log10(6) is trivial. But how, exactly, do you get 5 by multiply or dividing 2 and 3? Once you have log10(5) with whatever method you decide to use, log10(15) also becomes trivial. The problem is log10(5), you're never going to find a way to get log10(5) with the given the information.
 
  • #11
I am not being a smart ***, you will benifit more if you try to do your own assignment.
You should know that log10(10)=1, which I reminded you of above, from which
log10(5)=log10(10/2)=log10(10)-log10(2)=1.000000-0.301103
 
  • #12
You should know its not my assignment.

I'll concede, I didn't see that way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K