Log Question - Relationship between two points on log function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving logarithmic problems, specifically finding log base 6 of 5 and estimating the number of digits in 15 raised to the power of 10. The correct approach for part a involves using the change of base formula: log6(5) = log10(5) / log10(6). For part b, the estimation of digits in 1510 is achieved through the formula digits ≈ log10(1510), which simplifies to 10 * log10(15). The discussion emphasizes the importance of using known logarithmic values effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and properties
  • Familiarity with the change of base formula for logarithms
  • Basic knowledge of exponentiation and its relationship with logarithms
  • Ability to manipulate logarithmic expressions using known values
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn the change of base formula for logarithms in depth
  • Study logarithmic identities and their applications in problem-solving
  • Practice estimating the number of digits in large numbers using logarithms
  • Explore advanced logarithmic functions and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching logarithmic concepts, and anyone looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in mathematics.

maplesyrup23
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi Physics Forums,

I understand that I usually need to show that I've attempted a question in order to get feedback, but I have absolutely no idea how to approach this one Calculus Log question.

Base = 10

log (2) = 0.301103, log (3) = 0.47715

a.) Find log base 6 (5)

b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10

I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.

As for b, think of log base 10 and how numbers are written in base 10. Like, for example, 145 = 1*10^2 + 4*10^1 + 5*10^0. Since you know that a*10^1 + b^10^0, where a and b are between 0 and 9 inclusive, will never sum with c*10^2 to make a number higher than 999. log base 10 of any number between 100 and 999 will truncate to 2. Likewise, the log of any number between 1000 to 9999 will truncate down to 3. See the pattern?
 
Last edited:
TylerH said:
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.

It is possible I am reading it wrong, I haven't seen it written like this before, look at the printscreen.

EDIT: Sorry about the size of the image.
 

Attachments

  • PhysicsForums.png
    PhysicsForums.png
    447 bytes · Views: 534
That's definitely log base 6 of 5. There may be a way to do it, but if there is, I don't know it.
 
TylerH said:
That's definitely log base 6 of 5. There may be a way to do it, but if there is, I don't know it.

Crap, thanks anyways.
 
TylerH said:
Are you sure it isn't log base 5 of 6? Question a is impossible to do with the information given.
That is not true.

recall logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
a.) Find log base 6 (5)
log6(5)=log10(5)/log10(6)

recall logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10
digits~log10(15^10)
 
I assumed it was to be done with the log10 of 2 and 3. To clarify, it is impossible to estimate log6(5) with log10(2) and log10(3), using algebraic means.
 
lurflurf said:
That is not true.

recall logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
a.) Find log base 6 (5)
log6(5)=log10(5)/log10(6)

recall logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
b.) Estimate the number of digits in 15^10
digits~log10(15^10)

yeah Tyler was right. You're supposed to be using the given log values in the OP to do this question.

log 3 = 0.477,
and log 2 = 0.301
 
^No. Tyler said the given log values could not be used to do this question, but they can.

Try to rewrite each desired log ie log10(6), log10(5), log10(15) in terms of the given logs log10(2) = 0.301103, log10(3) = 0.47715, log10(10)=1 by using the familar rules
logb(xy)=logb(x)+logb(y)
logb(x/y)=logb(x)-logb(y)
logb(x^y)=y*logb(x)
 
  • #10
log10(6) is trivial. But how, exactly, do you get 5 by multiply or dividing 2 and 3? Once you have log10(5) with whatever method you decide to use, log10(15) also becomes trivial. The problem is log10(5), you're never going to find a way to get log10(5) with the given the information.
 
  • #11
I am not being a smart ***, you will benifit more if you try to do your own assignment.
You should know that log10(10)=1, which I reminded you of above, from which
log10(5)=log10(10/2)=log10(10)-log10(2)=1.000000-0.301103
 
  • #12
You should know its not my assignment.

I'll concede, I didn't see that way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K