Logarithmic Series question for finding ##\log_e2##

  • Thread starter Thread starter RChristenk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the logarithmic series and its application to finding ##\log_e 2##. Participants explore the Taylor series expansion of the natural logarithm and question the validity of substituting specific values into the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the series expansion of ##\log_e(1+x)## and the implications of substituting ##x=1##. There are questions about the convergence of the series and the conditions under which it can be applied.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the convergence of the series and the validity of the substitution. Some participants suggest that while the series converges, there are nuances regarding its application that need further exploration.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the radius of convergence for the Taylor series and the implications of poles in the complex plane. Participants also note that the standard notation for ##\log_e 2## is ##\ln 2##, and there are references to the need for justification in certain expansions.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Logarithmic Series question for finding ##\log_e2##
Relevant Equations
Binomial Theorem, Logariths
By definition:

##\log_e(1+x)=x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}- \cdots ## ##(1)##

Replacing ##x## by ##−x##, we have:

##\log_e(1-x)=-x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}-\dfrac{x^3}{3}- \cdots##

By subtraction,

##\log_e(\dfrac{1+x}{1-x})=2(x+\dfrac{x^3}{3}+\dfrac{x^5}{5}+ \cdots)##

Put ## \dfrac{1+x}{1-x}=\dfrac{n+1}{n}##, so that ##x=\dfrac{1}{2n+1}##; we thus obtain:

##\log_e(n+1)-\log_en=2[\dfrac{1}{2n+1}+\dfrac{1}{3(2n+1)^3}+\dfrac{1}{5(2n+1)^5}+\cdots]##

By putting ##n=1##,##\log_e2## is found. My question is why can't I set ##x=1## in ##(1)##?

##\log_e(1+1)=\log_e2=1-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}- \cdots##

I realize the numerical value is wrong, but why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RChristenk said:
My question is why can't I set ##x=1## in ##(1)##?

##\log_e(1+1)=\log_e2=1-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}- \cdots##
Why do you think you can't do that? That's exactly how you would produce a series expansion for ##\log_e 2##.
RChristenk said:
I realize the numerical value is wrong, but why?
It isn't wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and RChristenk
Using ##\log_e(n+1)-\log_en=2[\dfrac{1}{2n+1}+\dfrac{1}{3(2n+1)^3}+\dfrac{1}{5(2n+1)^5}+\cdots]## and setting ##n=1##, the result is ##\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{12}+\dfrac{1}{30}+ \cdots##. I thought this was different from ##1-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}- \cdots##.
 
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: Logarithmic Series question for finding ##\log_e2##
Relevant Equations: Binomial Theorem, Logariths

By definition:

##\log_e(1+x)=x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}- \cdots ## ##(1)##

That's not a definition; it's the result of expanding \ln(1 + x) in a Taylor series about x = 0.

The series has radius of convergence 1 because \ln 0 diverges. But by the alternating series test \ln 2 = \ln (1 + 1) = 1 - \frac12 + \frac13 + \dots converges.
 
RChristenk said:
Using ##\log_e(n+1)-\log_en=2[\dfrac{1}{2n+1}+\dfrac{1}{3(2n+1)^3}+\dfrac{1}{5(2n+1)^5}+\cdots]## and setting ##n=1##, the result is ##\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{12}+\dfrac{1}{30}+ \cdots##. I thought this was different from ##1-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}- \cdots##.
It's a different series. But, two different series may have the same sum. You could check quite quickly on a spreadsheet whether those two series appear to converge to the same limit.
 
RChristenk said:
##\log_e(1+x)=x-\dfrac{x^2}{2}+\dfrac{x^3}{3}- \cdots ## ##(1)##

My question is why can't I set ##x=1## in ##(1)##?
A Taylor series is best understood in the complex plane. It has a radius of convergence, so any pole in the complex plane determines the radius that applies to all x (it's better to use z in the complex plane). The invalid value of x= -1 for ##\log_e(1+x)## sets the radius of convergence centered at ##z=0## that means you can not use the Taylor series for x=1.
 
It should be noted that the standard notation for ##\log_e 2## is ##\ln 2##.
 
FactChecker said:
A Taylor series is best understood in the complex plane. It has a radius of convergence, so any pole in the complex plane determines the radius that applies to all x (it's better to use z in the complex plane). The invalid value of x= -1 for ##\log_e(1+x)## sets the radius of convergence centered at ##z=0## that means you can not use the Taylor series for x=1.
That's not quite true. The series at ##x = 1## converges by the alternating series test. It's true that, technically, you still need to justify that it converges to ##\ln(2)##. Which it does.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
PS that would explain the more detailed calculation in the OP. The shortcut ##\ln(1+1)## is a valid expansion, but technically it doesn't follow immediately from the basic theory of Taylor series. So, there would still be something to prove.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #10
RChristenk said:
Using ##\log_e(n+1)-\log_en=2[\dfrac{1}{2n+1}+\dfrac{1}{3(2n+1)^3}+\dfrac{1}{5(2n+1)^5}+\cdots]## and setting ##n=1##, the result is ##\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{12}+\dfrac{1}{30}+ \cdots##. I thought this was different from ##1-\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{3}- \cdots##.
I looked at this more closely. Better check the specific expansion you got for ##n = 1##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K