Look up for inspiration, down for desperation, left and right for information

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exams
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ethical implications of cheating during exams, emphasizing the moral and practical consequences of such actions. Participants unanimously reject the notion of looking "left and right for information" during tests, citing reasons such as the importance of genuine understanding over grades, the ethical responsibility to uphold integrity, and the long-term irrelevance of grades in professional settings. The Math Help Boards community maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy towards cheating, reinforcing the commitment to academic honesty.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of academic integrity principles
  • Familiarity with the implications of cheating in educational settings
  • Knowledge of the role of grades in career development
  • Awareness of ethical decision-making frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of academic dishonesty on long-term career success
  • Explore ethical decision-making models in education
  • Learn about the policies and consequences of cheating at various educational institutions
  • Investigate alternative assessment methods that promote integrity
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, academic integrity officers, and anyone interested in fostering a culture of honesty and understanding in educational environments.

Math1
In exams, we look up for inspiration, down for desperation, left and right for information.

Do You agree on this??

Father: Why did you get such a low score in that exam?
Son: Absence!
Father: You were absent on the day of the exam?
Son: No but the boy who sits next to me was!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Math said:
In exams, we look up for inspiration, down for desperation, left and right for information.

Do You agree on this??

Father: Why did you get such a low score in that exam?
Son: Absence!
Father: You were absent on the day of the exam?
Son: No but the boy who sits next to me was!

I totally reject the "looking left and right for information" for the following reasons:

1. It is morally and ethically wrong. That is reason enough not to do it. The one who cheats is lying about his abilities.

2. It shows that the person doing so has a misplaced emphasis on grades, as if grades were the be-all, end-all. Grades are highly over-rated. When you interview for your first job, you might be asked about your grades (unlikely, actually). I can almost guarantee you that when you interview for any job after that, you will not be asked for your grades.

3. It shows that the person doing so has very little interest in understanding the material (see my signature). The person who really wants to understand the material has to wrestle with it himself. Understanding and being able to apply the material is the really important thing in school.

4. If the person doing so were to realize how over-bloated his evaluation of grades are, he would see that the risks of getting caught simply aren't worth the payoff. (This is a pragmatic reason and, to my mind, much weaker than my reason # 1 above).

Reasons in favor of cheating: none.

I should also comment that here at Math Help Boards, we take a very dim view of cheating. We are quite willing to take any proof of wrong-doing all the way to the student's school. MHB has zero tolerance for cheating.
 
That was for fun i think though...
Ackbach said:
Reasons in favor of cheating: none.

.
I agree on achbach
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K