Looking for radio control components - wireless stepper motors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for suitable radio control components, specifically wireless stepper motors, for a project involving the Mk IV Tesseract. Participants explore various motor types, control mechanisms, and design considerations for a proof of concept experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks compact motors (<2 cm) that can be remotely operated and extend a piston several inches, expressing a need for 32 units.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of stepper motors, suggesting that reversible DC motors might suffice if a gearbox is used.
  • Hydraulics are proposed as an alternative approach, potentially combined with solenoid stop-blocks for the pistons.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of fitting motors, controllers, and power supplies into a compact design, with suggestions to consider muscle wire or linear motors instead.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of starting with the motor and power source sizes rather than constraining the design to a predetermined size for the Tesseract.
  • Participants discuss the need for the tubes to change length and the implications for power supply, noting that batteries must be contained within the structure due to its morphing nature.
  • There is acknowledgment that the project may require scaling up from initial size constraints, with some participants sharing insights on previous versions of the project and their mechanisms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and suggestions without reaching a consensus on the best approach or components. Multiple competing views on motor types and design considerations remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to size constraints, power supply integration, and the need for flexibility in design. There are unresolved questions regarding the specific force and displacement requirements for the motors.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in robotics, motor control systems, and experimental design in engineering may find this discussion relevant.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,478
Reaction score
8,745
I'm ready to begin proof of concept experiments on the Mk IV Tesseract, following on the limited success of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=205845"

What I need is a motor that
- is reasonably compact (we're talking <2 centimeters) though weight is not a factor
- can be operated remotely from my computer (probably a communications component attached to each motor)
- can extend a piston several inches, whether directly or through some sort of conversion such as rotary-to-translative gearing
- is affordable considering I'll need 32 of them

Can anyone give me pointers?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
That post that you linked to gave me a headache the first time that I saw it, and this was no better. :-p
If you're willing to use a gearbox, as your post indicated, then is it necessary for these to be stepper motors? Wouldn't any reversible DC unit be adequate?
Personally, my first thought for something like this would be low-pressure/volume hydraulics, possibly in combination with solenoid stop-blocks for the pistons.
On the other hand, you're the Science Advisor and I'm drunk. :biggrin:
 
Dave, I found these. There is no price unfortunately.

http://www.globalspec.com/FeaturedProducts/Detail/Linear_stepper_motors/77689/0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thats a tall order. The communications part shouldn't be to big of an issue, this is assuming your a BAMF with a hot air gun. http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/categories.php?c=16

But not only do you need just your motor and communication, but you also need your motor controller and power supply. There is no way that all this will fit in a 2 cm2 cube unless you have some very special manufacturing equipment. If I were you I would just throw the motor idea out the window. I would start looking at other avenues such as muscle wire or possibly even "linear motors". You haven't really specified what kind of force or displacement you will need.

http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8751
 
DaveC426913 said:
I'm ready to begin proof of concept experiments on the Mk IV Tesseract, following on the limited success of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=205845"

What I need is a motor that
- is reasonably compact (we're talking <2 centimeters) though weight is not a factor
- can be operated remotely from my computer (probably a communications component attached to each motor)
- can extend a piston several inches, whether directly or through some sort of conversion such as rotary-to-translative gearing
- is affordable considering I'll need 32 of them

Can anyone give me pointers?

Fun video, and interesting project. A couple thoughts:

-- Don't over-constrain yourself by setting the size of the TS and working into the motor/power source size. Start with the motor and power source sizes, and work out to the TS size. Sure, it will be bigger than you'd originally envisioned, but so what, it will work.

-- The tubes all have to be able to change length, right? So you have two pieces that slide into each other to contract in size?

-- Since it has no fixed points, the power supply has to be batteries contained in one or more of the arms, right? You can't hook a power cord onto that morphing beast!

-- Will it be hand-held as it morphs? Same as the power cord -- no way to suspend that morphing beast from a cable. I guess you could let it crawl across the tabletop as it morphs...

Fun project, Dave.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Topher925 said:
Thats a tall order. The communications part shouldn't be to big of an issue, this is assuming your a BAMF with a hot air gun. http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/categories.php?c=16
Awesome link! Though I have no idea what a BAMF ...

Oh. Right. I got it...

But why a hot air gun? Don't you mean soldering iron?

Topher925 said:
But not only do you need just your motor and communication, but you also need your motor controller and power supply. There is no way that all this will fit in a 2 cm2 cube

Motors come in that small easily. They can be powered by watch batteries. (It doesn't have to have much endurance).

The motors will power the struts which need to triple in length from min to max. Smaller is better, but I will scale up as needed. So far, my prototypes are ~5", so the total strut change is from 1.5" - 4.5".
 
berkeman said:
-- Don't over-constrain yourself by setting the size of the TS and working into the motor/power source size. Start with the motor and power source sizes, and work out to the TS size. Sure, it will be bigger than you'd originally envisioned, but so what, it will work.
Yep. You're thinkin' what I'm thinkin'. I provided the dimensions as a "most optimistic" first start. Don't want people to be offering motors the size of my fist...

berkeman said:
-- The tubes all have to be able to change length, right? So you have two pieces that slide into each other to contract in size?
Yep. The MkII uses that way. The MkIII uses elastic ribbon. There are other rigid ways, such as a rack & pinion system.

berkeman said:
-- Since it has no fixed points, the power supply has to be batteries contained in one or more of the arms, right? You can't hook a power cord onto that morphing beast!
Yep yep. It's impossible, even in theory, to wire up a power supply. The thing turns inside out; it would wind up the cord.

berkeman said:
-- Will it be hand-held as it morphs? Same as the power cord -- no way to suspend that morphing beast from a cable. I guess you could let it crawl across the tabletop as it morphs...

Fun project, Dave.
Yep yep yep.

You have an excellent grasp of my project.:smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K