Lower Bound on Q(x) for X ~ Gaussian RV

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iVenky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Gaussian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the bounds of the function Q(x), defined as Q(x) = P(X > x) for a Gaussian random variable X. It establishes that Q(x) is bounded by two inequalities: Q(x) ≤ (1/2)(e^(-x²/2)) for x ≥ 0 and Q(x) < [1/(√(2π)x)](e^(-x²/2)) for x ≥ 0. Additionally, it presents a lower bound: Q(x) > [1/(√(2π)x)](1 - 1/x²)e^(-x²/2) for x ≥ 0. The validity of these bounds is supported by analyzing the derivatives of Q(x) and the upper estimates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian random variables
  • Familiarity with probability theory
  • Knowledge of limits and derivatives in calculus
  • Basic understanding of exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Gaussian distributions and their cumulative distribution functions
  • Learn about the derivation of bounds in probability theory
  • Explore the concept of asymptotic analysis in statistics
  • Investigate the application of the Central Limit Theorem in relation to Gaussian random variables
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and data scientists interested in probability theory, particularly those working with Gaussian distributions and their properties.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
I think everyone knows that

Q(x)= P(X>x) where X is a Gaussian Random variable.

Now I was reading about it and it says that Q(x) is bounded as follows

Q(x)≤ (1/2)(e-x2/2) for x≥0

and

Q(x)< [1/(√(2∏)x)](e-x2/2) for x≥0

and the lower bound is

Q(x)> [1/(√(2∏)x)](1-1/x2) e-x2/2 for x≥0

Can you tell me how you get this?Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One example for the first inequality: It is exact at x=0, as you can check. For 0&lt;x&lt;\frac{1}{\sqrt{2pi}}, the derivative of the upper estimate is larger (negative with a smaller magnitude) than the derivative of Q(x), which is simply the normal distribution. Therefore, the upper estimate is valid.

In the same way, for all larger x, consider the limit of both for x->inf: It is 0. Now, the upper bound has a smaller derivative (negative with larger magnitude) everywhere, therefore it is valid there, too.

I would expect that you can get the other inequalities with similar methods.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K