How to obtain moment bound from the importance sampling identity?

  • I
  • Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Probability
  • #1
WMDhamnekar
MHB
376
28
TL;DR Summary
Let ##m(t) =E[X^t]## The moment bound states that for a > 0, ##P\{ X \geq a \}\leq m(t)a^{-t} \forall t > 0##. How would you prove this result using importance sampling identity?
Let ##X## be a non-negative random variable and let a > 0. We want to bound the probability ##P\{X \geq a\}## in terms of the moments of X.
- Define a function ##h(x) = \mathbb{1}\{x \geq a\}##, where ##\mathbb{1}\{\cdot\}## is the indicator function that returns 1 if the argument is true and 0 otherwise. Then, we have ##P\{X \geq a\} = E_f[h(X)]##, where ##E_f## denotes the expected value with respect to the pdf of X.
- Choose another random variable Y with probability density function (pdf) ##f_Y(y)## such that ##f_Y(y) > 0## whenever ##f_X(y) > 0##, where ##f_X(x)## is the pdf of X. This is called the importance distribution. Define the importance weight as ##w(x) = f_X(x)/f_Y(x)##.
- Apply the importance sampling identity to write ##E_f[h(X)] = E_g\left[\frac{h(Y)w(Y)}{g(Y)}\right]## where the expectation on the right-hand side is taken with respect to Y.
Now how to proceed further? Can we use here Jensen's Inequality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My Answer:
The importance sampling identity states that for any measurable function f and random variable X with probability density function p, the expected value of f(X) can be expressed as:

##E[f(X)] = \int f(x) p(x) dx = \int f(x) \frac{p(x)}{q(x)} q(x) dx,##

where q is another probability density function that we choose. This identity allows us to estimate E[f(X)] by sampling from q instead of p.

Now, let's move on to proving the moment bound using the importance sampling identity. We want to show that for any positive number a and any positive exponent t, the probability that ##X^t## is greater than or equal to ##a^t## is bounded by ##m(t) \cdot a^{-t}##.

To do this, we will choose the function ##f(x) = \mathbb{I}(x \geq a)##, where ##\mathbb{I}## is the indicator function that takes the value 1 if the condition inside the parentheses is true, and 0 otherwise. By applying the importance sampling identity to ##f(x^t)##, we have:

##E[f(X^t)] = \int \mathbb{I}(x^t \geq a^t) \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t.##

Now, notice that when ##x^t \geq a^t##, the indicator function takes the value 1, and 0 otherwise. Therefore, we can rewrite the above expression as:

##E[f(X^t)] = \int \mathbb{I}(x^t \geq a^t) \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t = \int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t.##

Now, let's focus on the integral ##\int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t##. We can rewrite this integral as the expectation of the random variable ##\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)##, where ##X^t## is sampled from the distribution q. Therefore, we have:

##E[f(X^t)]=\int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t = E\left[\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)\right].##

Now, since ##\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)## is a non-negative random variable, we can apply Markov's inequality, which states that for any non-negative random variable Y and any positive constant c, we have ##P\{Y \geq c\} \leq \frac{E[Y]}{c}##. Applying Markov's inequality to our expression, we get:

##P\left\{\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t) \geq {a^t}\right\} \leq \frac{E\left[\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)\right]}{a^t} =m(t) {a^{-t}}.##

But notice that the event ##\left\{\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t) \geq {a^t}\right\}## is equivalent to the event ##\left\{X^t \geq a^t\right\}##. Therefore, we have:

##P\left\{X^t \geq a^t\right\} \leq {m(t)}{a^{-t}}.##

And there you have it! We have successfully proved the moment bound using the importance sampling identity. This result tells us that for any positive number a and any positive exponent t, the probability that ##X^t## is greater than or equal to ##a^t## is bounded by ##m(t) \cdot a^{-t}##.

I think now this answer seems to look correct. Isn't it?
 

1. How do I calculate the moment bound using the importance sampling identity?

The moment bound can be calculated by taking the expectation of the squared difference between the original distribution and the importance sampling distribution. This can be written as E[(f(X) - g(X))^2], where f(X) is the original distribution and g(X) is the importance sampling distribution.

2. What is the importance sampling identity used for?

The importance sampling identity is used to estimate the expectation of a function with respect to a distribution by sampling from a different distribution. It allows us to reduce the variance of our estimate by choosing a more efficient sampling distribution.

3. What is the formula for the importance sampling identity?

The importance sampling identity can be written as E[f(X)] = ∫f(x)g(x)/h(x)h(x)dx, where f(x) is the function of interest, g(x) is the sampling distribution, and h(x) is the original distribution.

4. How does the choice of sampling distribution affect the moment bound?

The moment bound is affected by the choice of sampling distribution as it determines the efficiency of the estimate. A more efficient sampling distribution will result in a smaller moment bound, while a less efficient sampling distribution will result in a larger moment bound.

5. Are there any limitations to using the importance sampling identity?

Yes, there are certain limitations to using the importance sampling identity. One limitation is that it requires knowledge of the original distribution, which may not always be available. Additionally, the choice of sampling distribution can greatly impact the accuracy of the estimate, so careful consideration must be given to its selection.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
487
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
850
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
453
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
964
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
690
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
836
Back
Top