Magnetic Moment of a Charged, Rotating Sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between the magnetic moment \(\vec{\mu}\) and angular momentum \(\vec{L}\) for a solid spherical ball of mass \(m\) and charge \(q\) uniformly distributed on its surface. The established formula is \(\vec{\mu} = \frac{5q}{6mc}\vec{L}\). Participants explored the integration of charge distribution and current loops, highlighting the moment of inertia \(I_{sphere} = \frac{2mr^2}{5}\) as a critical component in the derivation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the areas involved in the integration process to arrive at the correct factor in the magnetic moment equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic moments and angular momentum in physics.
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia, specifically for solid spheres.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus.
  • Concept of charge distribution on surfaces and current loops.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of magnetic moments for different geometries, focusing on spherical and cylindrical shapes.
  • Learn about the application of integration in calculating physical properties of charged bodies.
  • Explore the relationship between charge density and current in various configurations.
  • Investigate the implications of the Biot-Savart Law in magnetic field calculations for rotating charged objects.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, mechanics, and advanced calculus. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of magnetic moments in rotating systems.

drumercalzone
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show for a solid spherical ball of mass m rotating about an axis through its center with a charge q uniformly distributed on the surface of the ball that the magnetic moment \mu is related to the angular momentum

\vec{\mu}={\frac{5q}{6mc}}\vec{L}

Homework Equations



\mu = \frac{IA}{c}

I_{sphere} = \frac{2mr^2}{5}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


My initial thought was to think of the sphere as rings of charge, each of which is comprised of point particles of charge dq=\frac{q}{4{\pi}r^2} which trace out current rings of area A={\pi}r^2. Then I could integrate dI w.r.t dr, but I got a factor of 1/4 instead of 5/6, making me think that I'm going about the integration the wrong way.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not all the rings have A = \pi r^2 - if they did, it would be a cylinder, not a sphere. See if that helps.
 
Okay, so for the area, I could integrate from 0->R twice to sum all the cross-sectional areas of the sphere:

A = \pi r^2 therefore dA = 2{\pi}rdr

and
A_{total}=2\int_0^R \! 2{\pi}rdr

and A= 2{\pi}R^2

Now we have: \vec{\mu} = \frac{q}{T} \frac{2{\pi}R^2}{c} = \frac{q{\omega}}{2{\pi}} \frac{2{\pi}R^2}{c} = \frac{q{\omega}R^2}{c} \frac{m}{m}<br />

Since the moment of inertia of a solid sphere is I_{sphere} = \frac{2mr^2}{5}<br />, we have \frac{5}{2} I_{sphere} in the equation. It follows that:
\vec{\mu} = \frac{5}{2}I \frac{q{\omega}}{c} = \frac{5q}{2mc} {\vec{L}}
But now I'm off by a factor of 1/3, so I still think I'm missing something in the integration...
 
I'm a little confused. I realize integration has to be done at some point, but isn't the surface area of the sphere 4 \pi r^{2} regardless of the charge?
 
blargh4fun said:
I'm a little confused. I realize integration has to be done at some point, but isn't the surface area of the sphere 4 \pi r^{2} regardless of the charge?

Originally I thought that surface area would come into play, but I think that since we're worried about Current Areas maybe not? I feel like there should be a dq in there somewhere. So maybe two integrals?
 
Ooh... I have to apologize because what I posted earlier doesn't actually make any sense. Not sure what I was thinking there :blushing:
drumercalzone said:
Okay, so for the area, I could integrate from 0->R twice to sum all the cross-sectional areas of the sphere:

A = \pi r^2 therefore dA = 2{\pi}rdr

and
A_{total}=2\int_0^R \! 2{\pi}rdr

and A= 2{\pi}R^2

Now we have: \vec{\mu} = \frac{q}{T} \frac{2{\pi}R^2}{c} = \frac{q{\omega}}{2{\pi}} \frac{2{\pi}R^2}{c} = \frac{q{\omega}R^2}{c} \frac{m}{m}<br />
I'm not really sure what you're doing here. You were right to think about splitting the sphere up into "slices" (individual current loops), but beyond that I think you might be confusing several different areas.

Let's think about the computation of the magnetic moment of a single current loop, which corresponds to a single slice of the sphere as shown in this picture:
sectioning.png

(the label got a little messed up, but \mathrm{d}a is the blue area). There are two areas involved that you need to deal with:
  • Each current loop consists of a certain amount of charge \mathrm{d}q. Since the charge is spread out over a surface, in order to find \mathrm{d}q, you need to multiply the surface charge density by the surface area over which the charge is spread. For one "slice"/current loop, the area to use for this is \mathrm{d}a, the blue area, as shown in the figure. (I'm using lowercase a to avoid confusion)
  • In order to find the magnetic moment of the current loop, you will need to multiply the current by the area enclosed by the current. Since the current runs around the edge of the "slice" of the sphere, you need the area of the slice, designated A in the picture. Note that the radius of this circle is not r, the radius of the sphere.
See if that enables you to find the current of a single "slice" \mathrm{d}I, the enclosed area A, and from that the magnetic moment of the slice \mathrm{d}\mu. Once you do that, you can integrate it to get the total magnetic moment of the sphere.
 
Bah. I don't know why this is eluding me.
Here's where I am now:

dq= \frac{q}{4{\pi}r^2}da , da=2{\pi}rdr

therefore:

dq = \frac{q}{2r}dr

(Here r is the radius of the slice, I'll use R for radius of the sphere).
However I don't think that I have my da right. What's the "thickness" of the slice that gives me my "d" term? Do I need to do this in terms of \theta and hope that it cancels out?

Then if I try to find A (area enclosed by the loop) I have:

A={\pi}r^2 , dA = 2{\pi}rdr

However this is the same as my da used to find q, and that can't be right...

Sorry for being so slow on this one! It's always the math that gets me, not the physics.
 
drumercalzone said:
dq= \frac{q}{4{\pi}r^2}da , da=2{\pi}rdr
...
(Here r is the radius of the slice, I'll use R for radius of the sphere).
Think carefully about which radius you need to use in each case. One of them is wrong.
drumercalzone said:
However I don't think that I have my da right. What's the "thickness" of the slice that gives me my "d" term? Do I need to do this in terms of \theta and hope that it cancels out?
Yes, you need to express it in terms of \mathrm{d}\theta. Don't worry about stuff canceling out just yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
745
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K