Magnetic monopole discovery, but not the creation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical basis for the discovery of natural magnetic monopoles, which are currently understood as quasiparticles in condensed matter systems rather than fundamental particles. Participants emphasize that while synthetic magnetic monopoles have been created, the existence of natural monopoles remains unproven. The conversation highlights the challenges in detecting these quasiparticles and the lack of reliable theories that predict their natural occurrence. Key references include research from the London Centre for Nanotechnology and various academic articles discussing the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quasiparticles in condensed matter physics
  • Familiarity with magnetic monopoles and their theoretical implications
  • Knowledge of experimental challenges in detecting magnetic phenomena
  • Awareness of current research trends in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings on magnetic monopoles from condensed matter systems
  • Explore the implications of Grand Unified Theories on magnetic monopole existence
  • Study experimental techniques for detecting quasiparticles in solid-state physics
  • Review historical and contemporary literature on the search for fundamental magnetic monopoles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in condensed matter physics, and anyone interested in the theoretical and experimental aspects of magnetic monopoles and their implications in particle physics.

quantumgeography
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
You have probably all heard about magnetic monopoles creation ,but I just want to ask is there theoretical basis
(without denying already proven theories) which would allow us to expect natural magnetic monopoles discovery?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07460
https://www.london-nano.com/researc...gnetic-monopoles-discovered-by-lcn-scientists
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html
Monopole.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These monopoles are not fundamental particles, they are a way of describing collective behavior in condensed matter systems.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
These monopoles are not fundamental particles, they are a way of describing collective behavior in condensed matter systems.

Thank you for your observation, but the question remains.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
These monopoles are not fundamental particles, they are a way of describing collective behavior in condensed matter systems.
Yes, magnetic monopoles are not fundamental particles (,because they are not proven yet) ,but they are hypothetical elementary particles in particle physics.
 
Define "natural". What is unnatural about the observed quasiparticles?
quantumgeography said:
but they are hypothetical elementary particles in particle physics.
Yes, and purely hypothetical so far.

What is your actual question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
mfb said:
Define "natural". What is unnatural about the observed quasiparticles?
Yes, and purely hypothetical so far.

What is your actual question?
Can we expect natural (as found in nature and not invovling anything made or done by people) magnetic monopoles discovery?
 
The crystals could occur naturally, not sure how often that happens, but there is nothing special about them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
mfb said:
but there is nothing special about them.
If there is nothing special about them, why then we do not detected them yet? I am discussing here the probability that we can not found things that just does not exist (that's why I am asking RELIABLE theories, that can PREDICT and not SUPPOSE magnetic monopoles discovery).
 
quantumgeography said:
If there is nothing special about them, why then we do not detected them yet?
Only a tiny amount of all crystals show magnetic monopoles as quasiparticles, and it is hard to study them experimentally. I don't know if there is a known natural material that shows them, but there is no fundamental reason why this should not occur.
 
  • #10
Again, what is your actual question? You seem to think that there is some relationship between the collective behaviors of spin-ices and monopoles as elementary particles. There isn't.
 
  • #11
Here are a couple of additional links on this enormously important topic. Sorry they are not very recent, but they are still interesting.

This is an overview from IEEE Spectrum.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/materials/the-hunt-for-the-magnetic-monopole

Here is an article concerning work at Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin.

https://www.helmholtz-berlin.de/aktuell/pm/pm-archiv/2009/pm-tennant-morris-monopole_en.html

I hope this thread is kept open, and that people who have time to follow this will continue to post news. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantumgeography
  • #12
I guess you have "presented" your topic with an off-topic statement (in your links).
If you ask for theories that predict the existence of fundamental magnetic monopoles, you could as well scroll through them in wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole#Grand_unified_theories_2
but of course, up to now all these are hypotheses (since we've never seen them in experiments so far).
Now if you're asking me about the perspectives of discovering such a thing - I won't say my beliefs (because up to now, that's a matter of taste and beliefs)... But scientists search for things even if they don't exist... We just don't like what fits well to our understanding :rolleyes: and new stuff are always welcome...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantumgeography
  • #13
Would it be more appropriate to open a thread on "news about magnetic monopoles?" instead of keeping this one? It's such an important topic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quantumgeography
  • #14
If there is something new, better open a new thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K