Magnitude 4-Vector Lorenz Gauge: Klein-Gordon Eq.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Klein-Gordon equation, specifically the relationship between the momentum four-vector and the four-potential under the Lorenz gauge. The equation is expressed as (E-eΦ)²-(pc-eA)²=m²c², highlighting the distinction between canonical momentum and mechanical momentum. It is clarified that the magnitude of the four-potential does not necessarily equate to zero, and the on-shell condition E²-p²=m² is applicable only to free particles, not to interacting ones. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these distinctions in quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Familiarity with four-vectors in relativistic physics
  • Knowledge of the Lorenz gauge condition
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Lorenz gauge in quantum electrodynamics
  • Explore the differences between canonical and mechanical momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of the Klein-Gordon equation in particle physics
  • Investigate the concept of on-shell and off-shell particles in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as students and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of the Klein-Gordon equation and its implications in particle interactions.

Thomas Rigby
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
The Klein-Gordon equation is based on the relation
(E-eΦ)2-(pc-eA)2=m2^2c2, which is the magnitude of the difference between the momentum four-vector and the four-potential.
Since the magnitude of the momentum four-vector is given by
E2-p2c2=m2c4, does it follow that the magnitude of the four-potential is zero? If so, does this follow from choosing the Lorenz gauge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No! You mix up canonical momentum and mechanical momentum. The KG equation reads (with natural units, ##\hbar=c=1##)
$$(\mathrm{i} \partial_{\mu}-q A_{\mu})(\mathrm{i} \partial^{\mu} - q A^{\mu}) \Phi=m^2 \Phi.$$
In the first-quantization formalism (which is not really applicable here, but let's give a simple though heuristic argument to clarify the issue) ##\mathrm{i} \partial_{\mu}## represents the canonical energy-momentum vector. So you cannot conclude ##E^2-p^2=m^2## from the equation. Also this is the on-shell condition for (asymptotic) free particles, but it's not valid for interacting particles.
 
Thank you for the answer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
740
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K