Man Dies on Planet X: Preserving Earth's History?

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario involving a team that dies on a planet with no known living organisms, questioning the implications for preserving Earth's history. Participants explore the feasibility of sending perishable materials to another planet for preservation, considering factors such as decomposition, environmental conditions, and the practicality of such an endeavor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if a team dies on a lifeless planet, they would remain intact indefinitely, raising the question of whether this could be a method to preserve Earth's history.
  • Another participant counters that humans carry bacteria that would lead to decomposition, challenging the initial assumption about eternal preservation.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of sending materials to another planet, with one participant arguing that it is easier and cheaper to store items on Earth.
  • Environmental factors such as temperature and atmospheric conditions are discussed as critical to the preservation of materials, with suggestions that a planet without atmosphere might be ideal.
  • One participant speculates about the potential need to send DNA into space only in the event of a cataclysm on Earth, rather than as a general preservation strategy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and merit of sending materials to another planet for preservation. There is no consensus on the implications of decomposition or the practicality of the proposed idea.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding environmental conditions and the biological processes involved in decomposition, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
Confession: I have no background in astronomy. I'm not even sure whether this question is apt.

So a hypothetical situation goes like this. One of my friends is filthy rich and has one of those richman fantasies. By chance, a space science institution is willing to offer him a trip to planet X. He does whatever it takes, and finally reaches planet X.

Unfortunately, the module is no more in the best of its condition, there are lots of technical difficulties to initiate the return trip. The team gives up, soon they all die. Since there is no other living organism on the whole of the planet, as learned by earlier expeditions, would this team lay dead for eternity(nothing to decompose).

If that is so, is it not the best idea to preserve all of Earth's perishable history by just sending all relevant materials to a particular planet?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
vin300 said:
Since there is no other living organism on the whole of the planet, as learned by earlier expeditions, would this team lay dead for eternity(nothing to decompose).
This is not true, as we carry a vast variety of bacteria already in us. So we will decompose.
If that is so, is it not the best idea to preserve all of Earth's perishable history by just sending all relevant materials to a particular planet?
This implies to choose a planet without atmosphere to exclude erosion. Say the moon. However, regarding the many craters on the moon, how should we exclude impacts? Also changes in temperature may play a role, since many of our materials don't like to be overheated or undercooled. After all, it's simply too expensive, and why should we at all? The Voyagers and our radio broadcasts are already sent out to last forever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
fresh_42 said:
This is not true, as we carry a vast variety of bacteria already in us. So we will decompose

Maybe not, it depend on the temperature and other environmental factors.

Still, OPs idea doesn't have a lot of merits. It's easier and cheaper to store things here. Maybe if some cataclysm was occurring we might want to shoot our DNA off into space hoping some kind Alien life would clone us or something.
 
Student100 said:
Maybe not, it depend on the temperature and other environmental factors.
Yes, if it is cold enough and the bodies cool down fast enough. But we don't inoculate our earthen bodies here with bacteria when we bury them, which means that there is nothing needed from outside, which was my point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
404
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K