Marcus 's question at Yahoo Answers (Bijectivity on finite and infinite sets)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Infinite Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the properties of bijections in finite and infinite sets, specifically focusing on the functions f and g mapping a finite set A to itself. It is established that if the composition f o g is a bijection for a finite set, then both f and g must also be bijections. However, for infinite sets, such as A = ℤ, it is demonstrated that f o g can be a bijection while either f or g may not be bijective. An example is provided where f(x) = ⌊x/2⌋ and g(x) = 2x, leading to f o g being the identity function, yet f fails to be injective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bijections, injections, and surjections in set theory
  • Familiarity with function composition
  • Basic knowledge of finite and infinite sets
  • Experience with mathematical notation and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijections in more detail, focusing on finite sets
  • Explore counterexamples of bijections in infinite sets
  • Learn about the implications of injective and surjective functions
  • Investigate the role of the identity function in function composition
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra or set theory, and anyone interested in the properties of functions and mappings in both finite and infinite contexts.

Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Supposed that A is a finite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A. Supposed in addition that f o g: A --> A is a bijection. Prove that f and g are both bijections.
Give an explicit example to show that the conclusions of the previous problem is false if A is an infinite set. In other words, if A is an infinite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A are functions and f o g: A --> A is a bijection it is not necessarily the case that f and g are both bijections.

Here is a link to the question:

Abstract math question: bijectivity on finite and infinite sets? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Marcus,

For a finite set $A$, any map $h:A\to A$ is injective iff it is surjective iff it is bijective. Suppose $f\circ g$ is a bijecion. Let us see that $g$ is injective $$g(x)=g(y)\Rightarrow f[g(x)]=f[g(y)]=(f\circ g)(x)=(f\circ g)(y)\Rightarrow x=y$$ That is, $g$ is injective which implies ($A$ finite) that $g$ is a bijection. Now, $$f=f\circ (g\circ g^{-1})=(f\circ g)\circ g^{-1}$$ and the composition of bijections is a bijection.

For $A$ infinite, consider $A=\mathbb{Z}$, and let

$$f:A\to A\;,\quad f(x)=\left\lfloor\frac{x}{2}\right\rfloor\\g:A\to A,\;\quad g(x)=2x$$ Then, $$(f\circ g)(x)=f(2x)=\left\lfloor\frac{2x}{2}\right\rfloor=x$$ is the identity, so $f\circ g$ is a bijection, but $f$ is not injective, for example $f(0)=f(1)=0$.

If you have further questions, you can post them in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f15/ section.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
620
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K