MHB Marcus 's question at Yahoo Answers (Bijectivity on finite and infinite sets)

Click For Summary
For a finite set A, if the composition of two functions f and g is a bijection, then both f and g must also be bijections. This is demonstrated through the injectivity of g leading to its bijectivity, and subsequently showing that f is also bijective. In contrast, for an infinite set A, such as the integers, it is possible for f and g to compose into a bijection while neither function is bijective individually. An example provided illustrates this with specific functions f and g, where their composition results in the identity function, confirming the distinction between finite and infinite cases. The discussion emphasizes the critical difference in behavior of bijections in finite versus infinite sets.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Supposed that A is a finite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A. Supposed in addition that f o g: A --> A is a bijection. Prove that f and g are both bijections.
Give an explicit example to show that the conclusions of the previous problem is false if A is an infinite set. In other words, if A is an infinite set, f: A --> A and g: A --> A are functions and f o g: A --> A is a bijection it is not necessarily the case that f and g are both bijections.

Here is a link to the question:

Abstract math question: bijectivity on finite and infinite sets? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Marcus,

For a finite set $A$, any map $h:A\to A$ is injective iff it is surjective iff it is bijective. Suppose $f\circ g$ is a bijecion. Let us see that $g$ is injective $$g(x)=g(y)\Rightarrow f[g(x)]=f[g(y)]=(f\circ g)(x)=(f\circ g)(y)\Rightarrow x=y$$ That is, $g$ is injective which implies ($A$ finite) that $g$ is a bijection. Now, $$f=f\circ (g\circ g^{-1})=(f\circ g)\circ g^{-1}$$ and the composition of bijections is a bijection.

For $A$ infinite, consider $A=\mathbb{Z}$, and let

$$f:A\to A\;,\quad f(x)=\left\lfloor\frac{x}{2}\right\rfloor\\g:A\to A,\;\quad g(x)=2x$$ Then, $$(f\circ g)(x)=f(2x)=\left\lfloor\frac{2x}{2}\right\rfloor=x$$ is the identity, so $f\circ g$ is a bijection, but $f$ is not injective, for example $f(0)=f(1)=0$.

If you have further questions, you can post them in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f15/ section.
 
Last edited:
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
361
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K