Markopoulou geometrogenesis planck similar to LQG?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Edward Wij
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lqg Planck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between Fotini Markopoulou's geometrogenesis and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) regarding their Planck scale structures. It establishes that geometrogenesis occurs during the Big Bang, while questioning the similarities or differences in Planck scale structures between the two theories. The conversation references key papers and concepts such as renormalizable asymptotically free Tensor Group Field Theories (TGFTs) and their implications for cosmology. Notably, it highlights the potential for a pregeometric phase to evolve into our current universe through phase transitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometrogenesis as proposed by Fotini Markopoulou
  • Familiarity with Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) principles
  • Knowledge of Tensor Group Field Theories (TGFTs)
  • Basic grasp of quantum graphity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of geometrogenesis in cosmology
  • Explore the relationship between Tensor Group Field Theories and Loop Quantum Gravity
  • Study the RG flow in quantum gravity theories
  • Investigate the concept of quantum graphity and its relation to geometrogenesis
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of quantum gravity and the early universe's structure.

Edward Wij
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Markus or others who are familiar with this.. I am aware Fotini Markopoulou Geometrogenesis occurs only during the Big Bang. But I'd like to know if it's Planck scale structure a present (after the Big Bang) is similar to the Planck scale structure of Loop Quantum Gravity? If they were not similar. How do their Planck scale structure differs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
I think it is the same as quantum graphity. The most recent comment on it I know of is in Rivasseau's http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1461.

"Hence just as asymptotic ultraviolet freedom of QCD has its infrared counterpart in quark connement and nuclear physics, we hope the RG flow of TGFTs (and in particular of the renormalizable asymptotically free TGFTs) to lead to a physically interesting cosmology. Suppose an observer could run down the RG flow of such a fundamental theory. He would see the universe, initially in its "pregeometric" phase, condense through the big-bang into an effective continuous space-time and cool with all its matter fields through many phase transitions and accretions to the present universe. Conversely, running the movie backwards, that is against the RG flow, he would see the universe dissolve into more and more elementary constituents and ultimately see space-time itself "boil" into a pregeometric phase described by the fundamental theory, in our case the perturbative regime of a TFGT.

In [28] the condensation of a pregeometric universe into the one we live in was dubbed "geometrogenesis" and the name graphity was coined to suggest that it could come from a purely combinatorial approach on graphs. In group eld theory this scenario of space-time emerging as a condensate has been extensively developed by D. Oriti and collaborators. In [182] a general discussion is given on the disappearance of continuum space and time at microscopic scale. The paper outlines the related conceptual issues and shows how the GFT framework for quantum gravity can provide a concrete computational approach to geometrogenesis."

The relationship between GFTs and LQG is reviewed in

http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3150
Group field theories for all loop quantum gravity
Daniele Oriti, James P. Ryan, Johannes Thürigen
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K