Mass spectrum of open bosonic strings

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mass spectrum of open bosonic strings as described in the context of string theory, specifically referencing the quantization process outlined in Zwiebach's textbook. The mass-shell condition for an open string is defined as M² = 2(N - 1)/l_s², where N is derived from the oscillator modes. Key findings include the identification of a tachyon for N=0, a massless vector boson for N=1, and multiple states for N=2, with 324 independent components linked to the representation of SO(25). The discussion also clarifies the implications of Lorentz invariance on the massless nature of the N=1 state and the representation theory relevant to SO(N).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory fundamentals, particularly open bosonic strings.
  • Familiarity with the light-cone gauge quantization method.
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance and its implications in physics.
  • Basic representation theory, especially concerning the group SO(N).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quantization of closed strings and their mass spectrum.
  • Explore the implications of Lorentz invariance in string theory.
  • Learn about the representation theory of SO(25) and its applications in particle physics.
  • Investigate the role of tachyons in string theory and their physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on string theory, quantum field theory, and particle physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the mass spectrum of open bosonic strings and related concepts.

snypehype46
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
This question regards some features about the excitation of an bosonic string
I'm learning string theory from the book by Zwiebach and others. I'm trying to understand the quantisation of the open string and its mass spectrum.

In light-cone gauge the mass-shell condition of an open string is given by:

$$M^2 = 2(N - 1)/l_s^2$$

where ##N = \sum_{i=1}^{D-2}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \alpha^i_{-n}\alpha^i_n## and ##l_s## is the string length scale.

Now to determine the mass spectrum of the string, we can look at the values of $N$:

- For ##N=0##, there is a tachyon since ##M^2## is negative
- For ##N=1##, there is a *vector boson* ##\alpha^i_-1 |0;k\rangle##.
- For ##N=2##, we have that ##M^2## is positive and the states are given by: ##\alpha^i_{-2}|0;k\rangle## and ##\alpha^i_{-1}\alpha^j_{-1}|0;k\rangle##

Now this is what I don't understand:

- Why is the state with ##N=1## a *vector*, why is not a scalar? How does one determine if a state is a vector or scalar?

- In the material I've read, it is claimed that Lorentz invariance requires that the the state with ##N=1## is massless, but I don't understand why is this case.

- Finally, the number of states with ##N=2## is claimed to 324 because it is the number of independent components of a matrix representation of ##SO(25)##, why is this? Also this state is said to have a single massive state with spin-2, why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first question: for N=1 you have (D-2) components labeled by i, which transform into each other if you apply a Lorentz transfo. That's some pretty weird scalar, but it makes sense for a massless vector irrep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46
Your 2nd: what do you get if you apply the momentum operator on the state and use the on-shell condition to calculate the mass (squared)? It should be zero, which is probably explained in Zwiebach.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46
3d: this is basic representation theory for SO(N). A rep. for this group can always be written as the sum of an antisymmetric part (#=1/2×N(N-1)), a traceless symmetric part (#=1/2×N(N+1)-1) and a trace (#=1). See e.g. Zee's book on group theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
768
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K