Mass spectrum of open bosonic strings

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mass spectrum of open bosonic strings within the framework of string theory, specifically focusing on the quantization process and the implications of the mass-shell condition in light-cone gauge. Participants explore the characteristics of states corresponding to different values of the oscillator number operator, N, and their classification as vector or scalar particles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the mass-shell condition for open strings and describes the states for various values of N, noting that for N=1, the state is a vector boson.
  • Another participant suggests that the presence of (D-2) components for N=1 indicates a massless vector representation, challenging the notion of it being a scalar.
  • A different participant prompts the calculation of mass using the momentum operator on the state for N=1, implying that it should yield zero mass, which may be explained in the referenced material.
  • Regarding N=2, a participant explains that the number of states corresponds to the independent components of a matrix representation of SO(25), referencing basic representation theory and the structure of representations for SO(N).
  • There is mention of a single massive state with spin-2 for N=2, but the reasoning behind this classification is not fully elaborated upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of the state for N=1 and the implications of Lorentz invariance, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of these states and their properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific texts and concepts from representation theory, suggesting that further assumptions or definitions may be necessary to fully understand the implications of the mass spectrum and state classifications.

snypehype46
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
This question regards some features about the excitation of an bosonic string
I'm learning string theory from the book by Zwiebach and others. I'm trying to understand the quantisation of the open string and its mass spectrum.

In light-cone gauge the mass-shell condition of an open string is given by:

$$M^2 = 2(N - 1)/l_s^2$$

where ##N = \sum_{i=1}^{D-2}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \alpha^i_{-n}\alpha^i_n## and ##l_s## is the string length scale.

Now to determine the mass spectrum of the string, we can look at the values of $N$:

- For ##N=0##, there is a tachyon since ##M^2## is negative
- For ##N=1##, there is a *vector boson* ##\alpha^i_-1 |0;k\rangle##.
- For ##N=2##, we have that ##M^2## is positive and the states are given by: ##\alpha^i_{-2}|0;k\rangle## and ##\alpha^i_{-1}\alpha^j_{-1}|0;k\rangle##

Now this is what I don't understand:

- Why is the state with ##N=1## a *vector*, why is not a scalar? How does one determine if a state is a vector or scalar?

- In the material I've read, it is claimed that Lorentz invariance requires that the the state with ##N=1## is massless, but I don't understand why is this case.

- Finally, the number of states with ##N=2## is claimed to 324 because it is the number of independent components of a matrix representation of ##SO(25)##, why is this? Also this state is said to have a single massive state with spin-2, why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first question: for N=1 you have (D-2) components labeled by i, which transform into each other if you apply a Lorentz transfo. That's some pretty weird scalar, but it makes sense for a massless vector irrep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46
Your 2nd: what do you get if you apply the momentum operator on the state and use the on-shell condition to calculate the mass (squared)? It should be zero, which is probably explained in Zwiebach.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46
3d: this is basic representation theory for SO(N). A rep. for this group can always be written as the sum of an antisymmetric part (#=1/2×N(N-1)), a traceless symmetric part (#=1/2×N(N+1)-1) and a trace (#=1). See e.g. Zee's book on group theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
878
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K