Master Non-Seperable ODEs for Physics | Crep Inc.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter crepincdotcom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a non-separable ordinary differential equation (ODE) related to the motion of a rocket, incorporating thrust, drag, and gravitational forces. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and transformations to address the complexities of the equation, including the effects of changing mass due to fuel expenditure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jack introduces the problem of a rocket's motion, presenting the overall acceleration equation that includes thrust, drag, and gravity.
  • Some participants note that the equation is effectively a second-order equation and suggest that the nature of the drag term r(v) is crucial for solving it.
  • Jack specifies r(v) as proportional to v², which leads to a discussion about the equation being a Riccati equation, with a suggestion to transform it into a Hill equation.
  • There is a proposal to use piecewise functions for the thrust term, which may simplify the problem into manageable segments.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to account for the loss of mass due to fuel expenditure, suggesting a momentum equation approach.
  • Jack considers the assumption of negligible mass loss for simplification but later proposes a linear function for mass loss over time.
  • There is a mention of using Laplace transforms to solve the integral equation formed, though some participants express unfamiliarity with this method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best approach to solve the problem, with no consensus on a single method. Some agree on the need to consider mass loss, while others explore different mathematical transformations without settling on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific form of the drag term r(v) and the assumptions made regarding mass loss. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the applicability of certain mathematical techniques, such as Laplace transforms.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying dynamics in physics, particularly in the context of rocket motion and differential equations, as well as individuals exploring advanced mathematical techniques for solving ODEs.

crepincdotcom
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I've been teaching myself some DEs that I can use for physics and whatnot. I am comfertable with seperable equations, but I can't figure out how to solve this problem.

Let's assume we have some rocket with thrust F(t) and drag r(v), plus acceleration due to gravity, g=9.8 m/s/s.

Overall acceleration: (m is the mass, assume constant)

[tex]a(t)=\frac{F(t)}{m} - \frac{r(v)}{m} - g[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{F(t)}{m} - \frac{r(v)}{m} - g[/tex]

Now as you can see, we can't move dt over to the other side, because there are multiple terms there. Can we simply distribute it across them, and get:

[tex]\int{dv}=\int{\frac{F(t)dt}{m}} - \int{\frac{r(v)dt}{m}} - \int{gdt}[/tex]

Also, we neet to relate v to t in the r(v) term, but we don't have a v(t)...

Thanks,

-Jack Carrozzo
jack _{at}_ crepinc.com
http://www.crepinc.com/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You effectively have a second-order equation, with a generalized function of the first derivative. You will need to be more specific about r(v) if you want to make any progress. If r(v) is linear, you're in luck - otherwise it may be quite tough to solve.
 
[tex]r(v)=(\frac{1}{2}rAc)v^2[/tex]

or simply

[tex]r(v)=kv^2[/tex]

which is not linear, per se.

How would I go about this?

Thanks,

-Jack Carrozzo
jack _{at}_ crepinc.com
http://www.crepinc.com/
 
Last edited:
I'd wager that you could probably use an integrating factor type equation or something along those lines.
 
Sorry - my bad. What you actually have (if r(v) is proportional to v^2) is a Riccati equation of the form

[tex]v^{\prime} + v^2 + f(t) = 0[/tex]

in v (give or take a constant or two). This is not generally soluble for any f(t). One thing you can do is make the transformation

[tex]v = \frac{u^{\prime}}{u}[/tex]

and sub, giving you the Hill equation

[tex]u^{\prime \prime} + f(t) u = 0[/tex]

which only helps if you actually know a solution and can therefore work backwards.

There are solutions of this Riccati equation for specific forms of f(t) - perhaps if you could give us some clue what the thrust term might be, we could explore it further.

sorry for the first (slightly misleading) post.

edit: as a guide to what sort of Riccati equations are soluble, you can check out

http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/ode/ode-toc1.htm

as they have some special cases listed.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I need to let that sink in for a bit before I can try to apply it.

Matthew Rodman said:
perhaps if you could give us some clue what the thrust term might be, we could explore it further.

The thrust equation is for the most part a type of step function: x Newtons for 0.5s, y Newtons for 2 sec, and z Newtons for 4 secs. That's a bit hard to express in an equation unless we use peice-wise.

Which come to think of it may work... if we solve the problem with T constant from t=0 to 0.5, then 0.5 to 2.5 and 6.5, each time carrying v0, perhaps we could solve it.

What do you think?

-Jack Carrozzo
jack _{at}_ crepinc.com
http://www.crepinc.com/
 
By the way - the equation is slightly doubtful - for a rocket you need to include the loss of mass due to fuel expenditure. Therefore m = m(t). You'll have to think about how this fits in - i.e., is the rate of fuel loss proportional to time?

Basically, you have to resort to a momentum equation, e.g.

[tex]\frac{d (m(t)v)}{dt} = F(t) - r(v) - m(t)g[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I was using the assumption that the mass lost compared to the total mass of the vehicle was negligable in order to make calculations easier, but if I were to include it, it would be some function of the form

[tex]m(t)=m_{v} - km_{p0}t[/tex]

or the mass of the vehicle plus the initial mass of the propellant decreasing linearly with time.

-Jack Carrozzo
jack _{at}_ crepinc.com
http://www.crepinc.com/
 
  • #10
^actually you'll have

dp/dt=dm/dt v +dv/dt m

so you can plug in the terms that give you the force.

F(t)-r(v)=v dm/dt + m dv/dt

so

F(t)- r(v)- v dm/dt = m dv/dt

so

F(t)/m(t) -r(v)/m(t) -v/m(t) dm/dt =a

as I recall rocketry problems are usually solved by a series of applications of Newtons laws and conservation of energy, ie no plug and play differential equations.
 
  • #11
out of curiosityin this problem is it allowed for us to assume that the rocket is incredibly massive in comparison to its fuel, thus assuming that mass is a constant?

also this appears to form an integral equation withintegral r(v) dt= v + q(t)

where q(v) is all of the other t terms grouped together.I think an equation of this form can usually be solved with a laplace transform correct?
 
  • #12
truthfully I've never heard of laplace transforms, so I'll take your word for it.

I've only ever seen the problem addressed as a numerical method wherein each part is solved for some small dt. I wanted to do it with diff EQs if possible.

Thanks guys

-Jack Carrozzo
jack _{at}_ crepinc.com
http://www.crepinc.com/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K