Mastering the Tricky Equation: How to Solve for T Without a Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter tedwillis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the equation \(3t + 100 = 4\left(\frac{9t^3 + 900t^2 + 30000t}{(3t + 100)^2}\right)\) derived from a differential equation. Participants emphasize the need to rewrite the equation in standard form, resulting in the cubic equation \(9t^3 + 900t^2 + 30000t - 1000000 = 0\). Techniques such as rescaling \(t\) to \(100s\) and substituting \(u = 3s + 1\) are suggested to simplify the algebra. The final goal is to determine when the percentage of an element in a container is at least 25% of the total volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic equations and their roots
  • Familiarity with differential equations, specifically the form \(dx/dt + 6x/(100 + 3t) = 3\)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations
  • Knowledge of rescaling techniques in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to solve cubic equations using methods such as synthetic division or the Rational Root Theorem
  • Study differential equations and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Explore algebraic manipulation techniques to simplify complex equations
  • Investigate rescaling methods in algebra for improved problem-solving efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying algebra and differential equations, as well as anyone interested in solving complex equations without calculators.

tedwillis
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to solve this equation that stems from a differential equation, though that isn't really important. Here's the equation that needs to be solved for t:

3t+100=4((9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)…

I've tried myself and always seem to hit a dead end. Using a calculator, I know the answer is 100/3(2^2/3-1) or ~19.58, but can't find a way to get to this answer.

I should mention, I would like this in a fully worked solution if possible. The subject does not allow calculators.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3t+100=4((9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)…
The three dots at the end of an equation usually means "and so on" - meaning to continue some sort of pattern. Is that what you meant here?
(there's also an extra bracket in there.)

Guessing "no" ... rewriting - you need t to satisfy the relation: $$(3t+100)^2 = 4(9t^3+900t^2+30000t)$$your first task (brute force) is to put the equation into standard form.

From the look of it, it is a cubic, so as many as three values of t may make this equation true. You should already know how to solve for the roots of a cubic.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, wrote the question wrong:
3t+100=4((9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)^2)
 
Last edited:
Here's some more info on the problem that may help:

x(t) is the amount of an element in a container

The original d.e:
$$dx/dt+6x/(100+3t)=3$$

100+3t=v, the total volume of liquid in a container over time. The max of this is 300.

Solving the d.e gives:
$$x(t)=(9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)^2)$$

Now, and this is where I am stuck, I have to find when the percentage of the element within the total liquid is ≥ 25%. This occurs when $$x/v=1/4$$, so $$3t+100=4x$$, hence:
$$3t+100=4((9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)^2)$$
 
Last edited:
Hmmm I get ##x(t)= c(3t-100)^2-3t+100## where c is the constant of integration.

But if you are still happy with yours - you still have a cubic.
Put it in standard form.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Hmmm I get ##x(t)= c(3t-100)^2-3t+100## where c is the constant of integration.

But if you are still happy with yours - you still have a cubic.
Put it in standard form.

Oh sorry, I forgot to mention the intial vlaue is x(0)=0
 
So I guess this is what you mean by standard form:

$$9t^3+900t^2+30000t-1000000=0$$
 
tedwillis said:
Sorry, wrote the question wrong:
3t+100=4((9t^3+900t^2+30000t)/(3t+100)^2)

It is easier (and more insightful) to re-scale this: set t = 100s in the equation, to get
(3s+1)^3 = 12(3s^3 + 3s^2 + s). It is easier to get high accuracy on a calculator when you do this, plus it is easier to manipulate, etc.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
It is easier (and more insightful) to re-scale this: set t = 100s in the equation, to get
(3s+1)^3 = 12(3s^3 + 3s^2 + s). It is easier to get high accuracy on a calculator when you do this, plus it is easier to manipulate, etc.

RGV
Following Ray's suggestion, let u = 3s+1. so that \displaystyle s=\frac{u-1}{3}\ .

That should make the algebra even cleaner.
 
  • #10
tedwillis said:
Oh sorry, I forgot to mention the intial vlaue is x(0)=0
In which case, c=-1/100 ... have you checked your DE solution?

Sammy and Ray have good suggestions for making things clearer.
You can look up how to solve a cubic equation... and that was "standard form" yes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K