Mathematical Biology- Neumann BCs, Turing Analysis

  • Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date
  • #1
binbagsss
1,234
10
This is probably a stupid question but I have Neumann BC boundary : ## \nabla u . \vec{n} =0## (same for ##v##)conditions for the following reaction-diffusion system on a [0,L_1]x[0,L_2]x...x...[0,L_n] n times in n dimensional space so ##u=u(x_1,...,x_n,t)## is a scalar I believe?

so that ## \nabla u . \vec{n} ## is a vector times a vector is a scalar,


my notes then say:

Untitled.png



and so, I'm confused how to argue, from, a summation of ##u_i## derivatives we conclude that each ##u_i## derivative must individually be zero? unless we are specifying ##n## different normal vectors, one for each surface (divided by two for the what would be a negative of this normal vector) ? so like ##(1,0...0)## ,...,(0,0,...1) ##

ahh this must be the case actually and i have misinterpreted the boundary condition?? thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 322
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
19,866
10,402
You only have one boundary condition per surface. The boundary conditions state that the derivative in the normal direction of the boundary is zero. This takes different forms on each boundary
 

Suggested for: Mathematical Biology- Neumann BCs, Turing Analysis

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
311
Replies
6
Views
918
Replies
6
Views
347
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
704
Replies
3
Views
705
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top