Mathematical Biology- Neumann BCs, Turing Analysis

  • Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date
1,155
6
This is probably a stupid question but I have Neumann BC boundary : ## \nabla u . \vec{n} =0## (same for ##v##)conditions for the following reaction-diffusion system on a [0,L_1]x[0,L_2]x...x...[0,L_n] n times in n dimensional space so ##u=u(x_1,.....,x_n,t)## is a scalar I believe?

so that ## \nabla u . \vec{n} ## is a vector times a vector is a scalar,


my notes then say:

Untitled.png



and so, I'm confused how to argue, from, a summation of ##u_i## derivatives we conclude that each ##u_i## derivative must individually be zero? unless we are specifying ##n## different normal vectors, one for each surface (divided by two for the what would be a negative of this normal vector) ? so like ##(1,0....0)## ,...,(0,0,.....1) ##

ahh this must be the case actually and i have misinterpreted the boundary condition?? thanks
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

Orodruin

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
15,928
5,909
You only have one boundary condition per surface. The boundary conditions state that the derivative in the normal direction of the boundary is zero. This takes different forms on each boundary
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Mathematical Biology- Neumann BCs, Turing Analysis" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Mathematical Biology- Neumann BCs, Turing Analysis

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
718
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top