A Matrix representation of a unitary operator, change of basis

Click For Summary
A unitary operator U can be expressed in terms of two complete basis vectors, allowing for the transformation of a general vector |α⟩ into a new basis. The expansion coefficients in the new basis can be obtained by multiplying the expression for |α⟩ by ⟨b^(k)|, leading to a relationship that connects the old and new basis representations. Specifically, applying the adjoint operator U† to the column matrix of |α⟩ in the old basis yields its representation in the new basis. However, applying U† directly to a basis vector |a₁⟩ does not produce the new basis representation, as the transformation is dependent on the complete set of basis vectors. This highlights the distinction between transforming entire vectors versus individual basis elements.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
If ##U## is an unitary operator written as the bra ket of two complete basis vectors :##U=\sum_{k}\left|b^{(k)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(k)}\right|##

##U^\dagger=\sum_{k}\left|a^{(k)}\right\rangle\left\langle b^{(k)}\right|##

And we've a general vector ##|\alpha\rangle## such that ##|\alpha\rangle=\sum_{a^{\prime}}\left|a^{\prime}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{\prime} \mid \alpha\right\rangle##

Sakurai writes at pg 50 :
"how can we obtain ##\left\langle b^{\prime} \mid \alpha\right\rangle##, the expansion coefficients in the new basis? answer is very simple: Just multiply (1.5.9) by ##\left\langle b^{(k)}\right|##
##
\left\langle b^{(k)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle=\sum_{l}\left\langle b^{(k)} \mid a^{(l)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(l)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle=\sum_{l}\left\langle a^{(k)}\left|U^{\dagger}\right| a^{(l)}\right\rangle\left\langle a^{(l)} \mid \alpha\right\rangle .
##
##(1.5 .1##
In matrix notation, (1.5.10) states that the column matrix for ##|\alpha\rangle## in the new basis can be obtained just by applying the square matrix ##U^{\dagger}## to the colum matrix in the old basis:
##\quad(\mathrm{New})=\left(U^{\dagger}\right)(##old ##)##"So if the matrix representing ##U^\dagger## is applied on to the matrix representing ##|\alpha\rangle## ,it gives the vectors representation in the new basis. But when I apply ##U^\dagger## onto say an basis vector ##\left|a_{1}\right\rangle## ,it doesn't give me the vectors representation in new basis as shown below :

##\begin{aligned} U^{\dagger}\left|a_{1}\right\rangle &=\sum_{k}\left|a^{k}\right\rangle\left\langle b^{k} \mid a_{1}\right\rangle \\ &=\sum_{k}\left(\left\langle b^{k} \mid a_{1}\right\rangle\right) \cdot\left|a^{k}\right\rangle \end{aligned}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should it? You rather have
$$\ket{b^k}=\hat{U} \ket{a^k}.$$
Sakurai in the quoted text uses the adjoint of this
$$\bra{b^k}=\bra{a^k} \hat{U}^{\dagger}.$$
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
744
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K