Matter/antimatter, mass questions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dav333
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between matter and antimatter, particularly in the context of the Big Bang and the subsequent annihilation processes. Participants explore concepts related to mass, energy conservation, and the behavior of particles in the early universe, seeking to understand the implications of these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention a ratio of one extra matter particle for every billion antimatter particles, questioning the implications for the universe's mass before annihilation.
  • There is a claim that the total mass, including energy, remains constant during annihilation, as described by the equation E=mc².
  • Others argue that energy is not globally conserved, particularly during the energy-dominated era of the universe, where photon energy decreased over time.
  • Some participants discuss the complexity of rest mass and its relationship to photons and other particles, noting that the behavior of particles changes depending on the context of their interactions.
  • A point is raised about the kinetic energy of particles being more significant than their rest mass energy during the era of abundant antimatter, influencing the production of new matter/antimatter pairs.
  • There is a discussion on how the expansion of the universe affects energy dynamics, leading to a loss of energy as the universe cools.
  • Some participants emphasize that the annihilation process does not result in a loss of total mass plus energy, while acknowledging the separate effects of cosmic expansion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on energy conservation and the implications of annihilation processes. While some agree on the constancy of total mass plus energy, others challenge this notion, leading to unresolved debates about the nature of energy and mass in the universe.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include complex interactions between kinetic and rest mass energy, as well as the effects of cosmic expansion on energy dynamics. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of mass and energy in different contexts.

Dav333
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I heard for every (think it was) billion antimatter there was 1 extra matter.

Does this mean before the annihilation after the big bang the universe was billions of times more heavy? So all that antimatter is now photons zipping around the universe?

Other question.
If there is all the matter & energy ever created, then why do particles pop in & out from the vacuum & annihilate each other? Looking for a simple answer if possible as wikipedia is over my head.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The total mass, including energy, was the same. Annihilation converts mass to energy (E=mc2).
 
There is no global energy conservation rule, and during the energy-dominated era, the BB photons lost energy, and their energy per photon was on average proportional to t-1/2. At a microsecond, when baryon pair production was stopping, there were ~a billion photons per excess matter baryon, and the average photon energy was roughly the same as the baryon energy (~1000 MeV). Now there is the same ~billion ratio, but the average photon energy is well below 0.01 eV. Also the photon energy is now decreasing more rapidly than t-1/2.
 
mathman said:
The total mass, including energy, was the same. Annihilation converts mass to energy (E=mc2).
This is incorrect. BillSaltLake has it right.
 
Correct, energy is not conserved. However, you can isolate small flat region where it is conserved. In the case energy was the same after the annihilation.

What had happened to the rest mass is much more complicated story. Photons don't have rest mass, other particles (say, protons) have it, but it is not clear what is it. If we look at photon at whole it is one story, if we look at it as bound quark system we get different number, if we go back to hot vacuum without Higgs condensate we get the 3rd number - probably 0.
 
Dmitry67 said:
Correct, energy is not conserved. However, you can isolate small flat region where it is conserved. In the case energy was the same after the annihilation.

What had happened to the rest mass is much more complicated story. Photons don't have rest mass, other particles (say, protons) have it, but it is not clear what is it. If we look at photon at whole it is one story, if we look at it as bound quark system we get different number, if we go back to hot vacuum without Higgs condensate we get the 3rd number - probably 0.
Well, at the time that there was a lot of anti-matter around, the rest mass was pretty much irrelevant. The particles themselves typically had a lot more kinetic energy than rest mass energy (this is why there was lots of anti-matter still around: if your particle has a lot more kinetic energy than rest mass energy, then collisions will often produce new matter/anti-matter pairs, to replace the ones that annihilate). The expansion cooled the universe until the typical kinetic energy became much smaller than the rest mass energy, and so the normal matter condensed out of the matter/anti-matter mix.

The result of this condensation is that the rest mass energy in the field in question got dumped into radiation. For example, when the temperature dropped much below the mass of the proton, anti-protons disappeared and their energy became radiation. Same thing happened when the temperature dropped much below the mass of the electron.

So you've sort of got two effects going on. Local interactions always conserve energy, in a sense. But globally the expansion was cooling everything down, meaning the universe lost energy as it expanded.
 
My point was that the annihilation process does not result in any loss of total mass plus energy. The effect of expansion is another matter.
 
mathman said:
My point was that the annihilation process does not result in any loss of total mass plus energy. The effect of expansion is another matter.
Ah, okay, good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K