Matter falling into a black hole

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of matter falling into a black hole, specifically focusing on the nature of the accretion disk, the gravitational field outside the event horizon, and the role of angular momentum. Participants explore theoretical concepts and clarify misconceptions related to black holes and their surrounding matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that as matter approaches a black hole, it gets pulled into a disk of spinning matter, which they assume is around the equator of the black hole.
  • Others question why the matter forms a disk rather than a sphere, suggesting that similar phenomena can be observed in other astronomical bodies like Saturn's rings and galaxies.
  • One participant notes that a black hole does not necessarily have an accretion disk, although many do, and emphasizes that outside the event horizon, the black hole behaves like a regular gravitational field.
  • Another participant discusses the importance of the impact parameter and trajectory, stating that not all trajectories will lead to being pulled into the black hole.
  • There is a mention of the critical radius related to the Schwarzschild radius, which defines how close one can get to a black hole without being trapped.
  • Some participants express confusion over popular science representations of black holes and acknowledge the complexity of understanding these concepts.
  • The Penrose process is brought up, with one participant reflecting on their understanding of energy dynamics involving particles in the ergosphere of a rotating black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement. While some clarify and refine their understanding of black hole dynamics, others challenge earlier claims and express uncertainty about specific concepts, particularly regarding trajectories and the nature of gravitational fields.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of "close enough" and "any trajectory," as well as the implications of angular momentum in the context of black holes. The discussion also highlights the complexity of gravitational interactions in general relativity compared to Newtonian gravity.

MikeeMiracle
Messages
396
Reaction score
313
TL;DR
Matter falling into a black hole
As I understand it, as you get closer to a black hole no matter what trajectory you were on approaching it, you will get pulled into the disk of spinning matter around the black hole which I assume is around it's equator?

I am just curious as to what is happening to the "space" in the disk, and above/below the disk why anything with any mass is always pulled into the disk itself. I guess, why does the "disk" exist and not a "sphere" of matter falling in from all directions.

I am a keen enthusiast but have not studied the topic so please no responces with equations or anything like that, just a no doubt over-simplification.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
MikeeMiracle said:
As I understand it, as you get closer to a black hole no matter what trajectory you were on approaching it, you will get pulled into the disk of spinning matter around the black hole which I assume is around it's [sic] equator?
Keep in mind, a BH does not necessarily even HAVE an accretion disk, although in practice most still do (and those discs will be eaten eventually).
 
MikeeMiracle said:
Summary:: Matter falling into a black hole

As I understand it, as you get closer to a black hole no matter what trajectory you were on approaching it, you will get pulled into the disk of spinning matter around the black hole

This is not true at all. A black hole, outside the event horizon, is just a regular gravitational field.

To be clear: if you were on a trajectory that would not have impacted the star before it became a black hole, then you should avoid the black hole as well. If your trajectory would have impacted the star, then you might still avoid the black hole. It depends on the "impact parameter" for the trajectory.

The critical radius is 3/2 times the Schwarzschild radius. That's as close as you can get without definitely getting trapped.

I suppose it depends what you mean by "close enough" and "any trajectory".

One difference between GR and Newtonian gravity is:

Theoretically, in Newtonian gravity, you would always escape a point mass, unless you were headed directly for it. But, in GR below a certain impact parameter (which approximately translates to initial angular momentum) you do not escape.
 
Last edited:
So the disk is all about the angular momentum of the combined system once something starts to fall in? I suspected angular momentum would play a part.
 
@PeroK Yes your right of course when you think about it, it should be just a regular gravitaional field outside the event horizon...

...You see this is the problem with believing you have a good understanding of something and then watch pop sci-fi videos as your bored, they just confuse and contradict your common sense and give you limited info to back up their claims.

Thanks for putting me back on the right path :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and phinds
MikeeMiracle said:
@PeroK Yes your right of course when you think about it, it should be just a regular gravitaional field outside the event horizon...

...You see this is the problem with believing you have a good understanding of something and then watch pop sci-fi videos as your bored, they just confuse and contradict your common sense and give you limited info to back up their claims.

Thanks for putting me back on the right path :)

I've updated my response.
 
PeroK said:
...

The critical radius is 3/2 times the Schwarzschild radius. That's as close as you can get without definitely getting trapped.

...
If this statement is true then I misunderstood the Penrose process. When 2 particles fall into the ergosphere one of them can not only escape but under specific circumstances one of them can leave with extra energy. Some part of the mass falling in always gets trapped.
 
stefan r said:
If this statement is true then I misunderstood the Penrose process. When 2 particles fall into the ergosphere one of them can not only escape but under specific circumstances one of them can leave with extra energy. Some part of the mass falling in always gets trapped.

I was thinking about single particle free-fall only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K