Maximizing Area of a Pentagon with Fixed Perimeter

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nabeshin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a maximization problem involving a pentagon composed of a rectangle and an isosceles triangle, with a fixed perimeter. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to determine the maximum area of the pentagon, including the use of Lagrange multipliers and geometric reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for the area A in terms of variables x and y, but expresses uncertainty about its correctness.
  • Another participant asserts that the area should depend only on the fixed perimeter P, not on x and y.
  • A participant shares results obtained using Lagrange multipliers, providing expressions for x, y, and z in terms of a fixed area A.
  • There is mention of a solution manual that presents side lengths in terms of the perimeter P, suggesting a method to derive the area from these lengths.
  • One participant suggests that rearranging the equation for constant area could simplify the problem, focusing on the angle of the triangle's pitch, which they find to be 30 degrees.
  • Another participant expresses interest in finding the ratio of x to y, indicating a desire for further exploration of the problem.
  • One participant calculates an area formula in terms of P and notes the interesting result that the angle is exactly pi/6.
  • A later reply questions the intuition behind the angle being 30 degrees, inviting further discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the area and the perimeter, with some focusing on specific mathematical approaches while others challenge or refine these ideas. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem may involve complexities related to the definitions of variables and the assumptions made in deriving formulas. There is also mention of the potential for trivial solutions in the context of partial derivatives.

Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
I was reviewing some multivariable calculus when I came across an interesting maximization problem. The problem is this:

Suppose that a pentagon is composed of a rectangle topped by an isosceles triangle. If the length of the perimeter is fixed, find the maximum possible area. (For picture, see: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v715/deagleman9/pentagon.jpg )

I thought it was a fun problem and hopefully some of you will agree. As for the answer, I'm not terribly confident but I got:
[tex]A=xy+\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}y^2[/tex]

Can anyone confirm that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The area of the largest such pentagon with perimeter P should depend only on P, not x and y.
 
I brute forced it with lagrange multipliers and got as follows:
-Fixed area A
-Base width x
-Height of rectangle y
-Height of triangle z

[tex]x=2 \sqrt{(2-\sqrt{3})A}[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{\sqrt{2 A}(3-\sqrt{3})}{3 (\sqrt{3}-1)}[/tex]

[tex]z=\sqrt{\frac{2-\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}}A}[/tex]
 
This looks almost identical a review problem in stewart.. 14.65

there's 3 different lengthed sides. the sides are

P(2-sqrt(3))
P(3-sqrt(3))/6
P((2sqrt(3))-3)/3

I imagine you can just plug those in and solve for A.

Now I must say that this is from a solution manual and I don't know how they got it... but the preceding chapter was gradient & partial derivatives so I expect you were supposed to write A in terms of x and y and then figure out the partials wrt x and y, set them both to zero, and disregard the trivial solution (if there is one). That gives you a system of two equations with two unknowns x & y, and its not a multivariable calculus problem anymore. Also it looks like that third side is just going to be (P-2x-2y)/2, so once you have x and y you have them all.
 
maze said:
I brute forced it with lagrange multipliers and got as follows:
-Fixed area A
-Base width x
-Height of rectangle y
-Height of triangle z

[tex]x=2 \sqrt{(2-\sqrt{3})A}[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{\sqrt{2 A}(3-\sqrt{3})}{3 (\sqrt{3}-1)}[/tex]

[tex]z=\sqrt{\frac{2-\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}}A}[/tex]
The problem was to maximize area for fixed perimeter.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The problem was to maximize area for fixed perimeter.

Yes, strictly speaking mazes solution doesn't directly answer the question. But in a way it does because the geometry of the obtained pentagon is the same in either case (max area for fixed perimeter or min perimeter for a fixed area).

Maze. A bit easier than Lagrange multipliers is to just rearrange the equation for constant area to express y in terms of x and z. Substitute this to get perimeter as a function of x and z only and solve the two partial derivatives equal zero. (Two non-linear simultaneous equations are a lot easier to manage than four. :smile: ).

I really just focused on finding the angle of the pitch of the roof [ atan(2z/x) ] , since this nicely summarizes the geometry of the resulting pentagon. Interestingly it's exactly 30 degrees.

BTW. My use of x,y and z above are as per mazes definition (x and y interchanged relative to Nabehin’s original diagram).
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah. I forgot to find the ratio of x to y. That would be interesting too.
 
go_ducks said:
This looks almost identical a review problem in stewart.. 14.65

there's 3 different lengthed sides. the sides are

P(2-sqrt(3))
P(3-sqrt(3))/6
P((2sqrt(3))-3)/3

I imagine you can just plug those in and solve for A.

Yup, this is what I get if I put things in terms of P.
If I just put all that into the area formula I get,
[tex]A=P^2 (\frac{1}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4})\approx .06699P^2[/tex]

Also, yeah it was interesting that the angle is exactly pi/6 !
 
Interesting...

Any ideas why, intuitively, it ought to be 30 degrees?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K