Maximum Voltage Between Long Coaxial Cylinders

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the maximum voltage between long coaxial cylinders, specifically focusing on the capacitance of cylindrical capacitors and the electric field between their plates. Participants are exploring the relationships between charge, voltage, and electric field in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of equations related to capacitance and electric fields, questioning the applicability of parallel plate capacitor formulas to cylindrical geometries. There is an exploration of how the electric field varies between the plates and the implications of introducing dielectric materials.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the electric field's uniformity and the geometry of the capacitor. Some have suggested using Gauss' law to analyze the electric field, while others have derived expressions for voltage and charge based on varying assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the plates of the cylindrical capacitor do not have the same area, and there is a consideration of the effects of dielectric materials on the electric field. The minimum radius of the inner cylinder is highlighted as a factor in determining maximum charge and voltage.

cwill53
Messages
220
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Derive an expression for the maximum voltage allowable between long coaxial cylinders of radii ##R_1##, ##R_2## (##R_2> R_1##), if the field strength in the insulation between them is not to exceed ##E_m##.

Answer: ##E_mR_1ln\frac{R_2}{R_1}##
Relevant Equations
##C=\frac{Q}{V}##
##E=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}##
At first, I started with the result from an earlier problem regarding the capacitance of a cylindrical capacitor:

$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{2\pi \varepsilon _0\varepsilon _rl}{ln(R_1/R_2)}$$
$$\Rightarrow V=\frac{Qln(R_2/R_1)}{2\pi \varepsilon _0\varepsilon _rl }$$

Then I used the equation involving the electric field between the plates of a parallel capacitor filled with a dielectric material:
$$E_m=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}$$
$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q}{Q-q}\frac{\varepsilon _0}{d}$$
$$C=\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q}{Q-q}\frac{\varepsilon _0}{d}$$
where d would be the distance between the parallel plate capacitor's plates, but I'll take to be ##R_2-R_1## for the cylindrical plates.
$$\frac{Q}{V}=\frac{Q\varepsilon _0S}{(Q-q)d}\Rightarrow V=\frac{Q(Q-q)d}{Q\varepsilon _0S}=E_md$$
I'm not sure where to proceed from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwill53 said:
Then I used the equation involving the electric field between the plates of a parallel capacitor filled with a dielectric material:
$$E_m=\frac{Q-q}{\varepsilon _0S}$$
You cannot assume that the parallel plate expression for E is applicable to the cylindrical plates. I assume that ##S## is the surface area of one of the plates and ##q## is the induced charge on the surface of the dielectric. Note that the plates of the cylindrical capacitor do not have the same area.

The electric field is not uniform between the plates of a cylindrical capacitor. You can use Gauss' law to find how the field varies between the plates. Then you can see where the field is a maximum. You might want to start with the case of no dielectric material between the plates. Adding the dielectric just changes the field in a simple manner.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cwill53
TSny said:
You cannot assume that the parallel plate expression for E is applicable to the cylindrical plates. I assume that ##S## is the surface area of one of the plates and ##q## is the induced charge on the surface of the dielectric. Note that the plates of the cylindrical capacitor do not have the same area.

The electric field is not uniform between the plates of a cylindrical capacitor. You can use Gauss' law to find how the field varies between the plates. Then you can see where the field is a maximum. You might want to start with the case of no dielectric material between the plates. Adding the dielectric just changes the field in a simple manner.
I decuded from this that E is maximum when R is minimum.
$$\Phi =EA=E2\pi Rl=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon}\Rightarrow E=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon Rl};\varepsilon =\varepsilon _r\varepsilon _0$$
$$V=\int -EdR=-\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}\int_{R_2}^{R_1}\frac{dR}{R}=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}\int_{R_1}^{R_2}\frac{1}{R}dR$$
From this,
$$V=\frac{Q}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
The minimum that R can be is ##R_1##, and this sets the maximum corresponding charge ##Q_m##.
$$E_m=\frac{Q_m}{2\pi \varepsilon R_1l}\Rightarrow Q_m=E_m2\pi \varepsilon R_1l$$
$$V_m=\frac{Q_m}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )=\frac{E_m2\pi \varepsilon R_1l}{2\pi \varepsilon l}ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
$$\Rightarrow V_m=E_mR_1ln\left ( \frac{R_2}{R_1} \right )$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Looks very good 😊
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and cwill53

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K