Mean and variance of difference operators on a time series process

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the mean and variance of the second difference operator, denoted as ${\nabla}_{2}{Y}_{t}$, applied to a time series process defined as ${Y}_{t}={m}_{t}+{\varepsilon}_{t}$, where ${m}_{t}=a+bt$ and ${\varepsilon}_{t}$ is an i.i.d. sequence with mean 0 and variance ${\sigma}^{2}$. The user initially calculated the mean as 0 and the variance as $4{\sigma}^{2}$, but the correct results are a mean of $2b$ and a variance of $2{\sigma}^{2}$. The discrepancy arises from misunderstanding the application of the second difference operator and its effect on the mean and variance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time series decomposition
  • Familiarity with the second difference operator in time series analysis
  • Knowledge of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables
  • Basic statistical concepts of mean and variance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the second difference operator in time series analysis
  • Learn about the impact of linear trends on time series mean and variance
  • Explore the derivation of mean and variance for different types of time series models
  • Investigate the role of i.i.d. sequences in statistical modeling
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, and researchers working with time series data who need to understand the implications of difference operators on mean and variance calculations.

deba123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
$$\text{Consider the following decomposition of the time series }{Y}_{t}\text{ where }{Y}_{t}={m}_{t}+{\varepsilon}_{t},\text{ where }{\varepsilon}_{t}\text{ is a sequence of i.i.d }\left(0,{\sigma}^{2}\right)\text{ process. Compute the mean and variance of the process }{\nabla}_{2}{Y}_{t}\text{ when }:{m}_{t}=a+bt.$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to MHB! :D

Can you show what you have tried so far so our helpers have some idea where you are stuck and can then offer better help?
 
MarkFL said:
Welcome to MHB! :D

Can you show what you have tried so far so our helpers have some idea where you are stuck and can then offer better help?

$$O.K\: so\: here's\: what\: i\: did:
{\nabla}_{2}{Y}_{t}=\nabla(\nabla{Y}_{t})=\nabla(({Y}_{t})-({Y}_{t-1}))={Y}_{t}-2{Y}_{t-1}+{Y}_{t-2}.
Which\: after\: expanding\: comes\: out:\:
{\varepsilon}_{t}-2{\varepsilon}_{t-1}+{\varepsilon}_{t-2}.
So\: mean\: is\: 0 \:and\: variance\: is\: 4{\sigma}^{2}.$$
$$But\:the\:answer\: is :mean=2b\:and\: variance=2{\sigma}^{2}.$$ I don't get how the answer came about something like that. Please help.
 
Did the answer detail the computations?
 
girdav said:
Did the answer detail the computations?

No it didn't. But the answer could be wrong. I just want to know where I was wrong (or right) and may be if I was using the wrong definition. Thanks for your help.
 
The term $2b$ for the variance could be explained if we had considered $m_t=a+bt^2$, but I fail to see how the $2\sigma^2$ terms come from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K