Measurement and the Conservation of Momentum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of measurement on the conservation of momentum in quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the effects of measuring a particle's position after its momentum has been prepared with precision. Participants explore the relationship between measurement, momentum, and the potential for apparent violations of conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that measuring a particle's position after preparing its momentum leads to a collapse of the momentum state, resulting in uncertainty about the momentum post-measurement.
  • Others argue that the measurement process involves an exchange of momentum between the particle and the measuring device, suggesting that total momentum is conserved in the combined system.
  • A later reply questions the implications of delayed measurements on momentum conservation, highlighting the need for a specific measurement scenario to resolve perceived paradoxes.
  • Some participants express skepticism about popular interpretations of quantum mechanics that suggest unobserved violations of classical conservation laws, indicating that such descriptions can be misleading.
  • One participant raises a question regarding the Copenhagen Interpretation and whether a particle can be said to have a momentum value prior to measurement, particularly in the context of the double slit experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of measurement for momentum conservation, with multiple competing views and unresolved questions remaining in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Copenhagen Interpretation, and the need for precise definitions of measurement scenarios to fully address the issues raised.

Bernard Brault
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you prepare a particle with a “relatively precise” momentum by the act of filtering or measuring its momentum. It’s state will collapse into a momentum eigenstate and the measured momentum will be the corresponding eigenvalue.
The position state will now be nearly uniformly spread out and the position unknown. But you can do a position measurement and the particle will register at a specific location but now it is the momentum that becomes unknown.

That seems to violate the principle of conservation of momentum. Prior to measuring position, we knew it’s monentum.

Possibly in both cases, it is the expected value of momentum that does not change.

But after measuring position, you could measure momentum again and get a different value then what you started with.
Where did the original momentum go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernard Brault said:
If you prepare a particle with a “relatively precise” momentum by the act of filtering or measuring its momentum. It’s state will collapse into a momentum eigenstate and the measured momentum will be the corresponding eigenvalue.
The position state will now be nearly uniformly spread out and the position unknown. But you can do a position measurement and the particle will register at a specific location but now it is the momentum that becomes unknown.

That seems to violate the principle of conservation of momentum. Prior to measuring position, we knew it’s monentum.

Possibly in both cases, it is the expected value of momentum that does not change.

But after measuring position, you could measure momentum again and get a different value then what you started with.
Where did the original momentum go?
The process of measuring position affects the momentum of the particle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Bernard Brault said:
Where did the original momentum go?
The measurement involves an exchange of momentum between the particle and the measuring device, so the total momentum of the combined system is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Nugatory said:
The measurement involves an exchange of momentum between the particle and the measuring device, so the total momentum of the combined system is conserved.
In delayed measurements, where does the missing momentum goes?
It appears that cheating is allowed as long as you cannot catch the cheater.
 
Bernard Brault said:
In delayed measurements, where does the missing momentum goes?
It appears that cheating is allowed as long as you cannot catch the cheater.
You'll have to describe the exact measurement scenario before we can properly resolve the paradox that you're seeing. Nonetheless, we know how it has to turn out: the momentum operator commutes with the complete Hamiltonian of the quantum system, so one way or another momentum is going to be conserved.

You do want to be aware that popular descriptions of how the uncertainty principle allows for unobserved violations of classical conservation laws (quantum fluctuations of energy, virtual particles popping in and out of existence, that we can cheat on momentum conservation as long as the cheating is not detected) are terribly misleading.
 
Nugatory said:
You'll have to describe the exact measurement scenario before we can properly resolve the paradox that you're seeing. Nonetheless, we know how it has to turn out: the momentum operator commutes with the complete Hamiltonian of the quantum system, so one way or another momentum is going to be conserved.

You do want to be aware that popular descriptions of how the uncertainty principle allows for unobserved violations of classical conservation laws (quantum fluctuations of energy, virtual particles popping in and out of existence, that we can cheat on momentum conservation as long as the cheating is not detected) are terribly misleading.

With regards to a single particle, I am not clear how under certain interpretations it can be thought to have a momentum value until measured. What I am thinking about is the Copenhagen Interpretation for example and the double slit experiment. I thought the "particle" was supposed to pass through all slits at the same time, and since getting to the slits involves velocities in different directions (or so I would assume) I was not clear on how prior to being measured the particle could be thought to have a momentum. So using the Copenhagen Interpretation is the "particle" in the double slit experiment thought to have a momentum prior to measurement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K