Measurement/observation in QM

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter E92M3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of measurement in Quantum Mechanics (QM), specifically addressing the collapse of the wave function and the role of observation. Participants question whether a conscious observer is necessary for measurement, and if a computer recording data influences wave function collapse. The conversation also touches on the implications of gravitational fields as continuous measurements and the conditions under which a quantum system remains in a specific state post-measurement. Key interpretations of QM, such as the Copenhagen and Bohm interpretations, are referenced as influencing these discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles, particularly wave function collapse
  • Familiarity with the Copenhagen and Bohm interpretations of QM
  • Knowledge of quantum observables and their commutability
  • Basic grasp of Hamiltonian mechanics and its role in time evolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of measurement in Quantum Mechanics through the Copenhagen interpretation
  • Investigate the role of consciousness in quantum measurement and the implications of observer effect
  • Study the concept of commutable observables and their significance in quantum state determination
  • Learn about Hamiltonian dynamics and its impact on quantum state evolution over time
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum theorists, and researchers interested in the philosophical implications of measurement in Quantum Mechanics.

E92M3
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
What counts as a measurement in QM? I am having trouble with this concept and have the following questions:

1. Can I say that by looking at a certain experiment I've collapsed the wave function into a particular state? In that case, doesn't it mean that a blind person will get a different result for a given quantum experiment?
2. What is capable of making a measurement? Is a conscious mind required? What if, for instance, a computer takes and stores reading. In this case, does the wave function only collapses when the scientist retrieves the data from the computer?
3. A charge object will affect the E and B field around it. Doesn't this mean that it is constantly under observation? The same can be said with any object with mass. We can always "feel" the object from its gravity, so are those measurements?
4. After a measure, we know what state the system is in, and if we immediately take a measure of any compatible (commutable) observable, we can be sure what eigenvalue we would get. In this case, how long would the system stay in such a state? Will it be in the state forever as long as we don't that measurements of non-compatible observables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
question 2 object to current philosophy of science discussion. It depends also on what interpretation of QM you have, the Copenhagen or Bohm etc.

3. there is a distinction between interaction and observation.

1. we don't look with our eyes on the experiment, the electrons etc are too small to be seen with our eyes, therefore the need of advanced apparatus

4. it depends on your hamiltonian which is the generator of time translations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
495
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K