Measuring Position of a Quantum Mechanical Particle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisphd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement Position
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on measuring the position of a quantum mechanical particle, specifically an electron in a 1-D box of length L. The participants explore the implications of separating the box into two distinct locations, such as Antarctica and Mexico, and the behavior of the wavefunction in this scenario. It is established that the wavefunction does not become discontinuous; rather, it smoothly vanishes between the two boxes. The conversation also references an experiment involving Rydberg wave packets, which demonstrates how manipulating relative phases of laser pulses can influence the position of electrons within their orbits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions
  • Familiarity with the concept of quantum tunneling
  • Knowledge of the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of quantum entanglement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • Explore experiments involving Rydberg wave packets and their implications
  • Learn about quantum tunneling and its effects on particle behavior
  • Investigate methods for manipulating wavefunctions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in experimental quantum mechanics and wavefunction manipulation.

chrisphd
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
How would one measure the position of a quantum mechanical particle?

For example, suppose I am aware that an electron lies in a 1-D box of length L. And maybe I wish to know the position of the particle in that box to a certain level of accuracy. I'm satisfied with knowing the position within a range of L/2 for example. So I decide to divide the box into two separate boxes somehow. (Note: The outer edges of the two boxes will have an infinite potential ensuring that there can be no quantum tunnelling.)

Ok, so now i separate my two boxes. One box is transported to Antarctica, and the other to Mexico. I think that quantum mechanics would suggest that a wavefunction is coexisting in both the boxes prior to any further measurements being made. Firstly, could someone please tell me if the above sentence is correct, because it seems very bizaar to me that a wavefunction of a particle can be discontinous, which would be required when the boxes are separated.

Now my final question is, what experiment might I be able to do in order to force the electron to collapse into one of the two boxes. Or another way of posing my question is, how can I determine which box the "particle" will lie in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can certainly have a particle wavepacket that is peaked in macroscopically separated places. The overall wavefunction is not discontinuous; in your example where tunneling is prohibited, the wavefunction vanishes smoothly between the two boxes. I like to then use the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics to understand these separated packets and other entanglement issues: http://quantum.phys.cmu.edu/CHS/histories.html

What experiment might I be able to do in order to force the electron to collapse into one of the two boxes. Or another way of posing my question is, how can I determine which box the "particle" will lie in.

Here's a related experiment that has been done (you could find other examples, but this is just one I remembered off-hand): http://www.aip.org/pnu/1995/split/pnu234-2.htm
It involves the sort of manipulations you're talking about:
"They find that by varying the relative phases of the laser pulses they can control whether the electron is on one side of its orbit or the other, a half micron away. Although they still possesses quantum properties, the electrons in a Rydberg wave packet state also behave in a sort of quasi-classical way like particles traveling in large elliptical orbits."

In your thought experiment, you might be able to invoke similar modifications so that you are modifying the wavepackets to make one region more unlikely than the other, perhaps even with zero amplitude in one box. Otherwise, without further modifications to your setup you can't determine which box the particle would be in without testing one of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K