Measuring Sea Level: Tides, Elevation & Distance from Earth's Center

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of measuring sea level, particularly in relation to the Earth's shape, tidal influences, and various datums used for height measurements. Participants explore how sea level is defined and measured across different regions, considering factors such as the Earth's ellipsoidal shape and local variations in sea level.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the existence of a median sea level used for data logs, emphasizing the need for a reference based on distance from the Earth's center.
  • Others note that different countries have their own mean sea levels and that the geoid used for GPS is not necessarily aligned with actual sea levels.
  • A participant mentions the historical use of various datums, including a 1927 USGS datum and a 1989 average sea level datum, highlighting inconsistencies in local applications.
  • There is a discussion about the polar radius being the lowest point on Earth and whether world sea level could be approximated to this level, excluding tidal effects.
  • Some participants argue that local sea level can vary significantly due to geological factors, such as crustal deformation and variations in local gravity.
  • One participant raises a question about ocean currents and their potential effects on sea level uniformity, suggesting that water's viscosity might influence how sea levels propagate.
  • A mathematical formulation for geocentric latitude and Earth's radius is provided, indicating a technical approach to understanding the Earth's shape and its implications for sea level measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the definition and measurement of sea level, with no consensus reached on a singular approach or understanding. The discussion remains unresolved, particularly around the implications of the Earth's shape and local variations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on various historical datums, the complexity of local geological factors affecting sea level, and the lack of a universally accepted mean sea level reference across different regions.

Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
Is there a median sea level that the logs of sea level data is based? I know the moon causes the tides which upsets the equilibrium on a constant basis. I need this sea level to be based upon the distance from the center of the Earth so with the elevation of a particular city on the Planet will be known.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Each country has it's own mean sea level.
There is also a median sea level for the geoid that is used for height above sea level for things like GPS - which ironically isn't actually the level of the sea anywhere. Since the Earth isn't a sphere the distance from the centre to sea level also depends on position.

http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0703/geoid1of3.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sea level data is based on a dated datum
we used 1927 USGS datum well into the 2000's
there was a ''new'' datum based on 1989 avg sea levels
but as far as I know that was seldom used

each city and county and state can use what ever it wants
as long as they tell you what it is based on
city of miami uses a datum .03 off the countys USGS datum
others may add on a 100 ft to avoid negative numbers
I would guess GPS data is based on a USGS datum
 
ray b said:
I would guess GPS data is based on a USGS datum
In just raw lat/lon mode GPS wil give your the altitiude based on the WGS84 ellipsoid and a global mean sea level.
Largely by coincidence this is quite close to MSL for most of the continental USA but can be upto 30m off in other parts of the world.
If you put the GPS into a local map system (OSGB, Swiss etc) then it will use the MSL defined by that country.

As pointed out above this can vary for both historical and physical reasons. There was a famous example of a bridge between Austria and Switzerland where the precisely surveyed approach roads missed each other by 1m in height. Neither country having an abundance of sea level of their own - Austria used Germany's based on the north sea and the Swiss use the italian level based in the Mediterranean.
 
Would it be way off base to say that the Polar Radius would be the lowest sea level point on Earth. If this is the case would world sea level also be at that same level neglecting tidal and wave forces. This would be an temporary approximation till USGS datum levels can be calculated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth

Polar Radius = 6,356.8 km

Equitorial Radius = 6,378.1 km
 
If by lowest you mean closest to the centre of the Earth then yes.
 
At this lowest point, Polar Radius, does this mean that the world's level is about the same sea level as Polar levels all around the world except for the tides?
 
No
The Earth is an oblate spheroid (pear shape) the polar radius is about 20km less than at the equator.
We pick an elipsoid that is a good average fit to this shape, locally sea level can vary by -106m to +85m from this average surface just due to bits of the crust that bend in vs bits that bend out.
Locally sea level can also vary by a few metres due to the different density of rock below the sea bed giving different local gravity.
 
  • #10
There are currents in the oceans such as the North Atlantic Current which flows thru convection. The warmer Atlantic current flows above the colder Artic current below. There may be similar currents in other places around the globe. Is there any currents flowing towards or against the artic to explain why the sea levels are not the same. Water is a viscous material. It will propagate evenly unless otherwise impeded. My question is: are the sea levels equal or are they impeded in some way?(neglecting the moon's tidal flow)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Geocentric Latitude = ATAN((1-f)^2*TAN(Lat))

where f=1/298.25 is flattening
Lat - Geographic Latitude

Earth's Radius = Sqrt(((a^2*Cos(GLat))^2+(b^2*Sin(GLat))^2)
/(((a*Cos(GLat))^2+(b*Sin(GLat))^2))

where a - Earth's Equatorial Radius
b - Earth's Polar Radius
GLat - Geocentric Latitude
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
4K