Measuring Time Intervals: How Precise Can We Go?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rahmuss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Current precision in measuring time intervals reaches the femtosecond range, approximately 10-15 seconds, using advanced techniques such as frequency combs that count electromagnetic oscillations in the visible spectrum. Traditional atomic clocks, like those based on cesium (Cs), operate in the nanosecond range, which is insufficient for detecting intervals as small as 51.7 x 10-24 seconds. The discussion also touches on the challenges of measuring the absorption and emission times of hydrogen atoms and the unpredictability of the direction of emitted photons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic clock technology, specifically cesium (Cs) atomic clocks
  • Familiarity with frequency comb techniques for measuring time
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly photon absorption and emission
  • Concepts of oscillation periods in electromagnetic waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of frequency comb technology and its applications in precision measurement
  • Explore the limitations of traditional atomic clocks and advancements in timekeeping
  • Investigate the quantum mechanics of hydrogen atom transitions and photon behavior
  • Study the implications of measuring time intervals at the femtosecond and smaller scales
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the precision of time measurement and its implications in sub-atomic physics.

Rahmuss
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure which location to post this in; but since it deals with the very small (sub-atomic), then I'll post it here.

Does anybody know just how precise they can measure time? Can they measure seconds down to 50 yotta seconds ([tex]10^{-24}[/tex])?

I have a theory (well, not quite that far yet, just a thought so far really) that would need to detect a difference in [tex]51.7*10^{-24}s[/tex] as an average, and some values would be much smaller.

Does anyone know how short of a time interval we can measure currently?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rahmuss said:
I'm not sure which location to post this in; but since it deals with the very small (sub-atomic), then I'll post it here.

Does anybody know just how precise they can measure time? Can they measure seconds down to 50 yotta seconds ([tex]10^{-24}[/tex])?

I have a theory (well, not quite that far yet, just a thought so far really) that would need to detect a difference in [tex]51.7*10^{-24}s[/tex] as an average, and some values would be much smaller.

Does anyone know how short of a time interval we can measure currently?

Measuring time is equivalent to counting oscillations of some periodic process. Traditional (e.g., Cs) atomic clocks used radio and microwave frequencies. The corresponding oscillation period in the nanosecond range. Recently a "frequency comb" technique has been invented which has allowed to count electromagnetic oscillations in the visible spectrum. This is the femtosecond range, which is still 10 orders of magnitude too coarse compared to your needs.

Eugene.
 
Last edited:
meopemuk - Wow! Thanks for the quick answer. That's good to know. I guess I'll work on that theory later. :D

Oh, hey, I thought of another way to try and accomplish what I need. Do we know how long absorption and emission takes for a hydrogen (single electron) atom in ground state? And if so, is there a way to determine which direction the re-emitted photon will travel? My guess is that the absorption and emission is not calculable and that the direction of the emitted photon could be anybody's guess... is that right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
989