Writing: Input Wanted Metal-rich moonlets / asteroids of lone Brown Dwarf sub-stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nik_2213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroids
AI Thread Summary
Metal-rich moonlets and asteroids are likely rare around lone Brown Dwarf sub-stars due to their formation conditions, which either lead to a lack of essential ingredients or result in ejection from unstable associations. Such bodies may possess moonlets composed more of cometary rocky ices rather than metals, as the formation of metallic cores requires a tumultuous environment with significant material disruption. The discussion also highlights that a Brown Dwarf in a wide binary system with a K5V-type star could potentially host Trojans and might have a sub-Saturnian planet. The distinction between different types of planetary materials is emphasized, noting that significant aggregation is necessary for the formation of rocky bodies. The conversation touches on the complexities of planetary formation and stability within these systems, indicating ongoing interest in studying such celestial bodies.
Nik_2213
Messages
1,218
Reaction score
493
My limited research suggests Metal-rich moonlets / asteroids will be uncommon around lone Brown Dwarf sub-stars.

By their nature, either they've been 'starved' on the ingredients front, or have been ejected from an unstable association, latter probably stripping outer satellites...

Either way, they may have moonlets, but tending towards 'cometary' rocky-ices rather than metallic. IIRC, latter would require a 'busy', if not 'tumultuous' time, with multiple planetesimals forming, material segregation, violent disruption to 'shatter & scatter' metallic core...

Is this reasoning valid ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I shrugged, went with a different idea.
When ship gets close enough to resolve moons' orbits, primary's mass is clearly not sub-Saturnian but Jovian++, a 'Brown Dwarf'...
Still has 'primordial Lithium', but significantly depleted Deuterium.
And nasty radiation belts...
Happens 'BD' is now a wide binary, Neptunian-distant to a K5V-type main-sequence. Which has a modest set of planets, including a 'genuine' sub-Saturnian....

Back to the 'Brown Dwarf': A lone 'BD' could only have moons / moonlets.
Would a 'BD' in this wide binary arrangement tolerate 'Trojans' ??
And might the K5V's 'sub-Saturnian' ??
 
We've found red dwarf stars with lots of planets. The wikipedia article shows them as being Earth-mass terrestrial:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habit...f_Earth-sized_worlds_around_ultra-cool_dwarfs

A good trick with Wilipedia is to scroll to the bottom to find references, and then read that stuff.
Could you have an Earth-mass jovian that is mostly hydrogen? Or does that size require metals? Also, remember that for astronomers "metal" might mean anything heaver than helium. That's annoying.
 
Indeed !!
Happily, 'planetary' and 'minor planet' astronomers do make a distinction between volatiles, rock/ice, rocky and nickel-iron. The latter definitely need significant aggregation of the others to form a sufficiently substantial 'planetismal' to stratify as rocky crust over metallic core, then be shattered in a collision..

IIRC, there's probe on way to study asteroid Psyche, a 'metallic'...

Tangential, I've tried to grok 'Hill Spheres' and such, which limit the stability bounds of orbits: Given a k5V's closer ice-line, a 20~~30 AU separation between that primary and 'BD' should suffice for 'BD' 'Trojans', but...

[ Post sub-edited by Duty Cat, delighted replacement C/H boiler is now on-line after miserable outage... ]
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
Back
Top