The Rev
- 81
- 0
Do you know what they call a Quarter Pounder in France?

The Rev
The Rev
motai said:Why be content with base 10 or 16 or 8... let's have something competely insane. How about base pi, or base i, or (for the sake of things) base 0.9999999 ...![]()
You mean like feet, inches, and yards?SpaceTiger said:Sort of like switching everyone to "natural" units.
wow someone finaly said practical, that's what i was thinking all along, might sound good to us but no one suggested an apraoch that would be most practical to the general public.SpaceTiger said:Heh, yeah. I think changing the base of our numbering system goes into that huge category of things that sound smart and cool to us nerds, but makes no practical sense whatsoever. Sort of like switching everyone to "natural" units.
ShawnD said:You mean like feet, inches, and yards?
SpaceTiger said:I mean the ones based on the various Planck scales. Here's a sample website:
http://superstringtheory.com/unitsa.html
The Rev said:Do you know what they call a Quarter Pounder in France?
I think you missed the joke. It's a quote from Pulp Fiction.brewnog said:
ShawnD said:I think you missed the joke. It's a quote from Pulp Fiction.
Dimitri Terryn said:What really disturbes me is that certain units depend on what they are used for. I mean, a stone is a different wheight depending on whether it is meat or liquid you are measuring?Talk about weird...
Almost. A pint of water weights about .96 pounds. It's probably as close a relationship as you can get, since the units of measure for liquid volume and weight were developed separately.Evo said:In the US, 16 ounces equals one pound, if it is a solid (weight), but 16 ounces equals 1 pint if it is a liquid (volume), but it would not weigh a pound. So ounces can be either.
Only for digital. For mechanical and analog devices, Grey Code works much better.Ivan Seeking said:I think we should use BCD.