Mgh & -gmM/R increase with distance from Earth

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ofeyrpf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth increase
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on gravitational potential energy, specifically the equation P = -GMm/r and its implications as one moves away from Earth. It is established that gravitational potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface, with a potential of 0 at infinity and approximately -62.53 mega-joules per kilogram at the Earth's surface. The gravitational constant G is defined as -6.674 x 10-11 N (m/kg)2, and the standard acceleration due to gravity is 9.80655 m/s2. The relationship between gravitational potential and kinetic energy is also clarified, emphasizing that potential energy decreases while kinetic energy increases during free fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and its equations
  • Familiarity with the gravitational constant G and its value
  • Knowledge of the mass and radius of Earth
  • Basic principles of kinetic and potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy equations
  • Learn about the implications of gravitational potential in astrophysics
  • Explore the concept of gravitational fields and their effects on objects
  • Investigate the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in various physical scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of gravitational potential energy and its applications in real-world scenarios.

ofeyrpf
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know potential = mgh where g can be considered constant close to the surface of the Earth. So as we move away from the Earth the h and P increase.
And taking P = 0 @ infinity then P = -GMm/r so P < 0 always and increases to 0 as you move away from the Earth.
So it seems there is no potential at infinity and even less as you get closer to the Earth! Is that correct?
What if for P = -Gmm/r, I put P = 0 at the surface of the Earth as it is for mgh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Of course, only potential differences are physically significant so you can add any arbitrary constant to your potential and thereby set your zero somewhere else.
 
ofeyrpf said:
So it seems there is no potential at infinity and even less as you get closer to the Earth!
Better stated as potential = 0 at ∞, and about -62.53 mega-joules / kilogram at the surface of the earth. In either case, potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface. You could define P = 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram - GMm/r to get a potential of 0 at the Earth's surface and 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram at ∞, which would correspond to mgh at relatively low altitudes.

The constants that would correlate with ~ 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram and g = 9.80655 m / s2 (standard value):

G = -6.674 x 10-11 N (m/kg)2
mass of Earth = 5.974 x 1024 kg
radius of Earth = 6376 x 103 m
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I understand now and see how P can be set to 0 anywhere but always "potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface."

It seems strange that although potential is caused because an object is in the Earth's gravitational field, it increases as you move away from the Earth, where i would think the Earth had less influence.
 
ofeyrpf said:
It seems strange that although potential is caused because an object is in the Earth's gravitational field, it increases as you move away from the Earth, where i would think the Earth had less influence.
That's because potential energy is defined as the negative of the work done by the force generating the field. If you consider the sum of the kinetic energy of an object in free fall (with no drag or other forces involved) in the gravitation field plus it's gravitational potential energy, the sum will be a constant as gravitational potential energy decreases and kinetic energy increases.

Gravitational potential is defined as the gravitational potential energy per unit mass, so it follows the same convention of increasing with distance from the source of the gravitational field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
14K