Find the speed of a satellite at a distance R from Earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the speed of a satellite at a distance R from Earth, with a focus on gravitational forces and orbital mechanics. Participants explore concepts related to gravitational force, orbital velocity, and mechanical energy in the context of circular orbits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the gravitational force and its relation to orbital velocity, questioning the assumptions about the nature of the orbit (circular vs. other types). There are attempts to equate centripetal force with gravitational force, and some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and variables involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on the relationships between gravitational force, kinetic energy, and potential energy, while others are seeking clarification on the problem statement and the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is some ambiguity regarding the definition of R (whether it refers to the radius of Earth or the distance from the satellite to Earth's center), and participants are questioning the implications of these definitions on the calculations. Additionally, the discussion touches on the concept of mechanical energy being negative in bound orbits.

  • #31
So, the total mechanical energy
= Ek + Ep = 1/2mv^2 + (-GmM/r) = gRm/4 - GmM/2R = -mgR/2. Is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Helly123 said:
So, the total mechanical energy
= Ek + Ep = 1/2mv^2 + (-GmM/r) = gRm/4 - GmM/2R = -mgR/2. Is it?
No. Do not mix g and G. You know that GM/R2=g, so GM=gR2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
  • #33
ehild said:
No. Do not mix g and G. You know that GM/R2=g, so GM=gR2.
Yes
 
  • #34
Helly123 said:
Yes
So what result did you get?
 
  • #35
Helly123 said:
So, r = 2R
r is distance from satellite to Earth's center
Btw, mechanical energy is Ek. The answer is -mGR/4
How can Ek be negative?

NO. The Mechanical Energy is the sum of the Gravitational Potential Energy plus the Kinetic Energy. The Kinetic Energy may be positive, but the Mechanical Energy value can still be negative, provided the Potential Energy is negative, and larger in size than the Kinetic Energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
  • #36
Ok. My answer is like Ep + Ek
While the formula i know for Ep is -GMm/r
r = 2R
Ek as usual is 1/2mv^2
V = ##\sqrt{ gmR/2}##

Ep + Ek
-GMm/2R + mgR/4 = -mgR/2 + mgR/4 = -mgR/4
Is that it?
 
  • #37
PeterO said:
NO. The Mechanical Energy is the sum of the Gravitational Potential Energy plus the Kinetic Energy. The Kinetic Energy may be positive, but the Mechanical Energy value can still be negative, provided the Potential Energy is negative, and larger in size than the Kinetic Energy.
PeterO said:
NO. The Mechanical Energy is the sum of the Gravitational Potential Energy plus the Kinetic Energy. The Kinetic Energy may be positive, but the Mechanical Energy value can still be negative, provided the Potential Energy is negative, and larger in size than the Kinetic Energy.
I see
 
  • #38
Helly123 said:
Ok. My answer is like Ep + Ek
While the formula i know for Ep is -GMm/r
r = 2R
Ek as usual is 1/2mv^2
V = ##\sqrt{ gmR/2}##

Ep + Ek
-GMm/2R + mgR/4 = -mgR/2 + mgR/4 = -mgR/4
Is that it?
Yes.
 
  • #39
ehild said:
Yes.
Ok
 
  • #40
The potential energy is negative and twice the magnitude of the kinetic energy (which is positive), thus the total energy is negative. So work is required to escape the gravitational well of the Earth no matter where you are.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K