A MHV /Parke-Taylor/BCFW references

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordred
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the search for quality literature regarding MHV and Parke-Taylor, with a specific interest in the proofs for the validity of the methodologies involved. A recommended resource is a PDF from TUM, which provides some useful insights. Participants mention Lance Dixon's lecture notes and another reference suggested by Srednicki's QFT book, indicating their relevance to the topic. The complexity of the literature is acknowledged, but the mathematical challenges of string theory are noted as a separate concern. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for thorough study of the recommended materials.
Mordred
Science Advisor
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
169
I've been having some trouble finding good quality literature in regards to MHV and Parke-Taylor.

One of the better references I found being

https://www.ph.nat.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bya/ttpmath/pdf/sheet10-11.pdf

What I've having difficulty finding is the proofs for validity of the methodology specifically. Any recommendations appreciated.
Complexity of the literature isn't an issue the QFT mathematics wouldn't be an issue though string theory mathematics would be.
(Haven't looked at String theory in the last few years)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Mordred
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Mordred and Dr.AbeNikIanEdL
Many thanks for both links they both contain much of the relevant details Will take time to properly study though lol
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
549
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
452
Replies
62
Views
55K
Replies
62
Views
10K