Minimal coupling of a Field with electromagnetism

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the minimal coupling of a spin-2 field with electromagnetism, referencing the work of Pauli and Fierz regarding the introduction of the covariant derivative in the Lagrangian. It is established that for the coupling to occur, the matter field must be complex-valued or reside in a Z2-graded algebra, ensuring the necessary degrees of freedom are maintained. Additionally, it is noted that electromagnetism couples to gravity automatically when the Lagrangian is expressed in curved spacetime, with specific mathematical implications involving the metric and the action.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics in field theory
  • Familiarity with gauge theories, specifically U(1) gauge theory
  • Knowledge of complex fields and Z2-graded algebras
  • Basic principles of general relativity and curved spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the covariant derivative in Lagrangian formulations
  • Explore the role of complex fields in gauge theory coupling
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of Z2-graded algebras
  • Review Dirac's brochure on General Relativity for insights on electromagnetism in curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in field theory, gauge theories, and the interplay between electromagnetism and gravity.

Jesus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have some doubts about minimal coupling of a field of spin 2 for example, with the electromagnetism and I hope someone can help me to clarify them.

According to Pauli and Fierz one couples the field with electromagnetism introducing the covariant derivative at the level of the Lagrangian, but, does the field need to be complexified in the lagrangian in order to maintain the same degrees of freedom than before we turn on the electromagnetic interaction?

At least that is what I have seen in the literature but I don't have clear why complexify the field.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you have two different problems: 1. Coupling of gravity with electromagnetism in the absence of (presumably electrically charged) matter. 2. Coupling of electromagnetism to electrically charged matter in the presence of gravity.

2. Electromagnetism is a linear U(1) gauge theory. It's necessary for the matter field to be either complex-valued (thus at least 2 types of fields) or more generally with values in a Z2-graded algebra (= involuted algebra), else the coupling will not occur. So indeed there are particular requirements on the matter fields before trying to see how they couple to an e-m field. Gravity couples to both the e-m field and to matter. There's no requirement on the matter field coming from the gravity sector.
1. Electromagnetism couples to gravity automatically if you write down the former's Lagrangian action in a curved space-time. The metric enters in a nice way (through F2) and in a pesky way through √-g. For details, see the wonderful <80 p. brochure on General Relativity by Dirac.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jesus
Jesus said:
I have some doubts about minimal coupling of a field of spin 2 for example, with the electromagnetism and I hope someone can help me to clarify them.

According to Pauli and Fierz one couples the field with electromagnetism introducing the covariant derivative at the level of the Lagrangian, but, does the field need to be complexified in the lagrangian in order to maintain the same degrees of freedom than before we turn on the electromagnetic interaction?

At least that is what I have seen in the literature but I don't have clear why complexify the field.

Thank you.

Recall the interaction Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = A_{\mu} J^{\mu}.
1) What is J^{\mu}?
2) If the matter field (of any spin) is real, does J^{\mu} exist?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K