Minimizing Aphi' + Bcos(phi) in [0,L] w/ phi(0)=0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Minimization
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 2K views
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13
I'm trying to find a function for x in [0, L] that minimizes this:

[tex]\int_0^{L} A \phi(x) \frac{ d \phi(x) }{dx} + B cos(\phi(x))\ d\mbox{x}[/tex]

For real (given) positve numbers A and B.

with
[itex]\phi(0) = 0[/itex]
[itex]\phi(x)[/itex] is an increasing positve function.

Can somebody point me in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a calculus of variations problem.

I'm no expert, but the principal thing to do would be to find the Euler-Lagrange equation for [itex]\phi(x)[/itex]. The solution (or solutions) to that equation will be the function which minimizes that integral.

I don't exactly know how to do this, but if you look at the Wikipedia article on the calculus of variations, and go down to the section on the Euler-Lagrange equation, you should find some useful tips there.
 
Yes I get the zero function then but that is not what I am looking for.
 
Yes I get the zero function then but that is not what I am looking for.

[tex]\frac { \partial L } { \partial \phi } = A \frac{d \phi}{dx} -C sin ( \phi(x))[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dx } \left( \frac { \partial L } { \partial \phi' } \right) = A \frac{d \phi}{dx}[/tex]

[tex]\frac { \partial L } { \partial \phi } - \frac{d}{dx } \left( \frac { \partial L } { \partial \phi' } \right) = C sin ( \phi(x)) = 0[/tex]
 
Also, since you're integrand doesn't depend explicitly on [itex]x[/itex], you can try the simplified Euler Lagrange equation instead:
[itex]L-\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi}\frac{d \phi}{d x} = const[/itex].
Here, that would translate to
[itex]A \phi \phi' + B Cos(\phi) -(A \phi' - B Sin(\phi))\phi'= const[/itex]
or rather
[itex]A (\phi-\phi') \phi' + B \big(Cos(\phi) -\frac{d}{dx}( Cos(\phi)\big)= const[/itex]

I don't know how to solve this off the top of my head, but this equation probably admits more than zero as a solution.
 
Yes, you are right but I do not see how this is going to help me. This might be easier than an integral but this a non linear DE and I do not think an analytical solution exists.
 
Since [itex]\phi\phi' = \frac12 (\phi^2)'[/itex] you are trying to minimize [tex] \frac{A\phi(L)^2}{2} + \int_0^L B\cos(\phi(x))\,dx.[/tex] The Euler-Lagrange equation is then [tex]B\sin(\phi) = 0[/tex] so that indeed [itex]\phi(x) = 0[/itex].

Do you have reason to believe that any other (differentiable) solutions exist? Also, although [itex]\phi(x) = 0[/itex] is not a strictly positive strictly increasing function, it is a positive increasing function.

(For weak solutions, you can take [tex] \phi(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & 0 \leq x < x_0 \\<br /> (2n+1)\pi & x_0 \leq x \leq L \end{cases}[/tex] for some positive integer [itex]n[/itex] and if [itex]0 < 2L - \frac{A(2n+1)^2\pi^2}{2B} < L[/itex] then for any [itex]0 < x_0 < 2L - \frac{A(2n+1)^2\pi^2}{2B}[/itex] you have [tex] \frac{A\phi(L)^2}{2} + \int_0^L B \cos(\phi(x))\,dx = \frac{A(2n+1)^2\pi^2}{2} - B(L - x_0) < BL,[/tex] the last being the value attained when [itex]\phi[/itex] is zero.)
 
I made a mistake with the model. I will create a new thread.
 
Last edited: