Misunderstanding in converting atomic weight to kg (s.state physics)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the mass density of Sodium and the number of atoms per cubic centimeter for Aluminum, using atomic weights and crystal structures. The participant Naftali calculated the atomic weight of Sodium as 3.818 x 10-23 grams and derived a density of 1.009 g/cm3, while the expected value is 0.97 g/cm3. For Aluminum, Naftali calculated an atomic density of 6.025 x 1023 atoms/cm3, compared to the expected 6.028 x 1023 atoms/cm3. The discrepancies were attributed to potential errors in the volume calculation of the unit cell and the use of different values for Avogadro's number.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic weight and its conversion to atomic mass.
  • Familiarity with crystal structures, specifically body-centered cubic (bcc) lattices.
  • Knowledge of Avogadro's number (6.022 x 1023).
  • Basic skills in density calculations and unit conversions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the calculation of crystal lattice constants and their implications on density.
  • Learn about the differences between x-ray density and macroscopic density measurements.
  • Investigate the impact of defects and vacancies in crystal structures on material properties.
  • Explore the significance of using accurate constants in scientific calculations, such as Avogadro's number.
USEFUL FOR

Students in materials science, physicists, and chemists who are involved in density calculations and crystal structure analysis will benefit from this discussion.

naftali
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two questions :
1. find the (mass) density of Sodium. Atomic weight: 22.9898. Crystal structure: bcc. a=4.23 angstrom (crystal constant).
2. Given the (mass) density of Aluminum : 2.7 g/cm^3. Atomic weight: 26.982. Find the number of atoms density (# of atoms per cm^{3}).

Homework Equations



These questions looks trivial, but my answers are slightly different from the given solutions.
I think that this might be because I have a mistake in the conversion from atomic weight to the weight of an atom.
To my understanding, the atomic weight is the weight in grams of Avogadro number (6.022\times10^{23}) of atoms.

The Attempt at a Solution



Therefore I get:
1. The weight of an atom is : \frac{22.9898}{6.022\times10^{23}}=3.818\times10^{-23} gram. And since in bcc there are 2 atoms in unit cell we have density of:
\frac{2\times3.818\times10^{-23}}{{(4.23\times10^{-8})}^{3}}=1.009 g/cm^{3}
But the given solution is 0.97 g/cm^{3}

2. The number of atoms density (# of atoms per cm^{3}), is density/atom's weight. Atom's weight = \frac{26.982}{6.022\times10^{23}}=4.481\times10^{-23} gram. Therefore, the atomic density is : \frac{2.7}{4.481\times10^{-23}}=6.025\times10^{23} atoms/cm^{3}.
But the given solution is 6.028 \times10^{23} atoms/cm^{3}.

Where is my mistake?
Thanks,
Naftali
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have correctly calculated the weight of an atom.

I think you need to check how you have calculated the volume of a cell. See..

http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~engmats/xtal/crystal/crystal.html

Sorry for editing this a few times.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From one corner of the bcc to the diagonally opposite corner is four time the radius of an atom (r+2r+r = 4r). If the length of a side is "a" then

a2+a2+a2=(4r)2

a=SQURT(4r2/3)

Wikipedia says the radius is 1.86 Angstroms so

a=4.295 x 10-8m

Thats different from your value of 4.23

Then density is

= (2 x 3.818 x 10-23)/(4.295 x 10-8)3
= 0.964g/cm3
 
The lattice constant is given in the problem (a=4.23 A). No need to calculate it. And the volume of the BCC cell is a^3. You don't need the atomic radius for this problem.

You did the calculations correctly for both parts. If the numbers are a little off then maybe they used different values for Avogadro number or something like this. Or your calculator is a little off.
On the other hand, if you compare with values from literature, then the given lattice constant may be a little off.

PS. I did the calculations with the values given (4.23 A, 22.9898) and NA=6.022 10^23 and I've got density of 0.96g/cm^3.
So after all, it may be a problem with your computation process.
 
Last edited:
Thanks you all for the answers.

nasu - sorry, despite my tries I don't get this result (and I tried another calculator..), I will be thankful if you can show your calculation process.

Thanks
 
naftali said:
Thanks you all for the answers.

nasu - sorry, despite my tries I don't get this result (and I tried another calculator..), I will be thankful if you can show your calculation process.

Thanks

Sorry, my bad. I suspect I used 6.22 instead of 6.022 in Avogadro number.
You are right, with the numbers given in the problem, you get a value of 1.00 if rounded to 3 digits. This is a little larger than the values measured by macroscopic techniques, which are below 1 (sodium floats on water).
It does not necessarily mean that the given values are wrong.
The so called x-ray density (calculated above) may happen to be larger than the actual density of the crystal. And even more so for polycrystalline materials. Defects, vacancies, pores and other factors may all contribute to reduce the density.
 
Thanks anyway..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K