Modern Physicists: Late 1800s - Present Suggestions

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AaronGaTech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around suggestions for a semester-long project on physicists from the late 1800s to the present, focusing on significant contributions in physics. Participants share their thoughts on potential figures to study, debating the relevance of certain individuals.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially suggests Nikola Tesla but seeks alternatives that are less obvious.
  • Another participant proposes Ernest Rutherford, highlighting his contributions to the understanding of the atomic nucleus.
  • A third participant agrees that Tesla is more of an engineer and suggests looking at the Nobel Prize winners in physics for more options.
  • A later reply acknowledges Tesla's relevance to physics despite his engineering background and expresses interest in Rutherford due to the participant's nuclear engineering major.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Tesla is more associated with engineering than physics, but there is no consensus on the best alternative suggestions for the project.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of "physicist" and "significant contributions" may vary among participants, which could influence their suggestions.

AaronGaTech
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm taking modern physics class, and we have to do a semester long project over any physicist from the late 1800s on. My first thought was Tesla, but I want a not so obvious choice. So any suggestions would be appreciated. Just anybody that made somewhat significate contributions in any area of physics from the late 1800s to the present.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tesla was more of an electrical engineer. Choose someone like Earnest Rutherford, who in essence discovered that the atomic nucleus was not made of plum pudding (very large and soft), but instead was very small and very hard. See

http://www.rutherford.org.nz/biography.htm

Bob S.
 
Last edited:
I know he was an engineer, but still relates pretty well with physics. But Rutherford is an awesome choice. I'm actually a nuclear engineering major, I find his stuff very interesting. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K