Modified Heat Equation Solutions with Asymptotic Decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bob321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat equation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 6K views
bob321
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

Given the following heat equation

[tex]u_t = u_{xx} + t - x^2,[/tex]

I'd like to find all solutions [tex]u(x,t)\in C^2(\mathbb{R}^2)[/tex] such that the quotient

[tex]|u(x,t)| / (|x|^5 + |t|^5)[/tex]

goes to zero as the sum [tex]|x| + |t|[/tex] goes to infinity.

I know how to do the same problem with the usual heat equation [tex]u_t = u_{xx}[/tex], but I'm not entirely sure how to deal with this extra [tex]t - x^2[/tex] term. I suspect I can still start by taking the Fourier transform (in x) of each side to get something like:

[tex]\partial_t \hat{u}(\xi,t) = \widehat{\partial_t u}(\xi, t) = -|\xi|^2 \hat{u}(\xi,t) + \widehat{t-x^2}(\xi) = -|\xi|^2\hat{u}(\xi, t) + t\delta(\xi) - \delta^{\prime\prime}(\xi),[/tex]

which gives me an ODE in t that is easy enough to solve. The issue is that I think this method only gives me smooth (by which I mean infinitely differentiable) solutions. Are there other [tex]C^2[/tex] solutions that I am missing with this approach?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bob321 said:
Hi folks,

Given the following heat equation

[tex]u_t = u_{xx} + t - x^2,[/tex]
This solves "nicely" by a modified techinique using separation of Variables. If the boundary value problem is on a string of finite length I can post all the steps where are required to solve this analytically.
 
Your equation is linear, so, as long as you have nice boundary conditions, the solution is unique. Check your notes.
 
AiRAVATA said:
Your equation is linear, so, as long as you have nice boundary conditions, the solution is unique.
Why is it linear? Perhaps you mean to say it is quasi-linear. It cannot be linear for if u_1 and u_2 are solutions does not mean that u_1 + u_2 are solutions.


@bob321. I will post complete steps, but I am unable to since you do not provide a boundary and initial value problems.
 
The problem is over the entire real line so there are no boundary conditions, and the initial condition [tex]u(x,0)[\tex] can be an arbitrary [tex]C^2[\tex] function. I've actually since worked out the general solution using the Fourier transform, as I started to do in my original post.<br /> <br /> Thanks.[/tex][/tex]
 
Kummer said:
Why is it linear? Perhaps you mean to say it is quasi-linear. It cannot be linear for if u_1 and u_2 are solutions does not mean that u_1 + u_2 are solutions.

It is linear. If [itex]L<u>=u_t+u_{xx},</u>[/itex] then [itex]L[u_1+u_2]=L[u_1]+L[u_2][/itex]. What is not is homogeneous. A PDE is said to be quasilinear when is linear in the higher derivative term, but not necesarily in the terms of lower order.

bob321 said:
The problem is over the entire real line so there are no boundary conditions

That is a boundary condition. You want your solutions to converge at [itex]\pm \infty[/itex], so [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}u(x,t)=0[/itex].