Modified Heat Equation Solutions with Asymptotic Decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bob321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat equation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding solutions to a modified heat equation of the form u_t = u_{xx} + t - x^2. Participants explore various methods for solving this equation, including Fourier transforms and separation of variables, while addressing the implications of boundary conditions and the linearity of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the Fourier transform to solve the modified heat equation but expresses uncertainty about whether this method captures all C^2 solutions.
  • Another participant suggests that separation of variables can be used to solve the equation, particularly in the context of a boundary value problem on a finite string.
  • There is a claim that the equation is linear, with a challenge raised regarding the definition of linearity, suggesting it may be quasi-linear instead.
  • A participant clarifies that the problem is defined over the entire real line, indicating that there are no boundary conditions and that the initial condition can be any C^2 function.
  • Further clarification is provided that while the equation is linear, it is not homogeneous, and the requirement for solutions to converge at infinity is discussed as a form of boundary condition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the linearity of the equation, with some asserting it is linear and others suggesting it is quasi-linear. The discussion also highlights a lack of consensus on the implications of boundary conditions in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of solutions and the treatment of boundary conditions, which remain unresolved. The implications of the linearity versus quasi-linearity of the equation are also debated without a clear resolution.

bob321
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

Given the following heat equation

[tex]u_t = u_{xx} + t - x^2,[/tex]

I'd like to find all solutions [tex]u(x,t)\in C^2(\mathbb{R}^2)[/tex] such that the quotient

[tex]|u(x,t)| / (|x|^5 + |t|^5)[/tex]

goes to zero as the sum [tex]|x| + |t|[/tex] goes to infinity.

I know how to do the same problem with the usual heat equation [tex]u_t = u_{xx}[/tex], but I'm not entirely sure how to deal with this extra [tex]t - x^2[/tex] term. I suspect I can still start by taking the Fourier transform (in x) of each side to get something like:

[tex]\partial_t \hat{u}(\xi,t) = \widehat{\partial_t u}(\xi, t) = -|\xi|^2 \hat{u}(\xi,t) + \widehat{t-x^2}(\xi) = -|\xi|^2\hat{u}(\xi, t) + t\delta(\xi) - \delta^{\prime\prime}(\xi),[/tex]

which gives me an ODE in t that is easy enough to solve. The issue is that I think this method only gives me smooth (by which I mean infinitely differentiable) solutions. Are there other [tex]C^2[/tex] solutions that I am missing with this approach?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bob321 said:
Hi folks,

Given the following heat equation

[tex]u_t = u_{xx} + t - x^2,[/tex]
This solves "nicely" by a modified techinique using separation of Variables. If the boundary value problem is on a string of finite length I can post all the steps where are required to solve this analytically.
 
Your equation is linear, so, as long as you have nice boundary conditions, the solution is unique. Check your notes.
 
AiRAVATA said:
Your equation is linear, so, as long as you have nice boundary conditions, the solution is unique.
Why is it linear? Perhaps you mean to say it is quasi-linear. It cannot be linear for if u_1 and u_2 are solutions does not mean that u_1 + u_2 are solutions.


@bob321. I will post complete steps, but I am unable to since you do not provide a boundary and initial value problems.
 
The problem is over the entire real line so there are no boundary conditions, and the initial condition [tex]u(x,0)[\tex] can be an arbitrary [tex]C^2[\tex] function. I've actually since worked out the general solution using the Fourier transform, as I started to do in my original post.<br /> <br /> Thanks.[/tex][/tex]
 
Kummer said:
Why is it linear? Perhaps you mean to say it is quasi-linear. It cannot be linear for if u_1 and u_2 are solutions does not mean that u_1 + u_2 are solutions.

It is linear. If [itex]L<u>=u_t+u_{xx},</u>[/itex] then [itex]L[u_1+u_2]=L[u_1]+L[u_2][/itex]. What is not is homogeneous. A PDE is said to be quasilinear when is linear in the higher derivative term, but not necesarily in the terms of lower order.

bob321 said:
The problem is over the entire real line so there are no boundary conditions

That is a boundary condition. You want your solutions to converge at [itex]\pm \infty[/itex], so [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}u(x,t)=0[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K