Modular Arithmetic Word Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding and solving modular arithmetic problems, particularly finding specific integers under modular conditions. The first question involves calculating 48^307 modulo 713, with suggestions to use repeated squaring to simplify the computation. The second question asks for an inverse of 41 modulo 660, with guidance provided on using Euclid's algorithm to find the multiplicative inverse. Clarifications on notation, such as the meaning of congruence classes, are also addressed. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for practical examples and techniques to tackle modular arithmetic effectively.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm currently trying to do some modular arithmetic questions but I don't really know where to start, I don't have much in the way of examples, only a list of theorems. I'm no genius so theorem's by themselves are not enough to enable me to apply them so I've been stuck on some questions. Can someone help me with them?

Q1. Find an r \in Z such that 0 \le r < 713 and 48^{307} \equiv r\left( {\bmod 713} \right). A possible answer is 12.

The next question is similar I think but I haven't been able to figure out what to do.

Q2. Find an m where 0 <= m < n and m \equiv l\left( {\bmod n} \right) with l = 482 and n = 14.

I don't necessarily expect anyone to do the whole pronblem for me, even an indication as to the required technique would be good. This is because I really have no idea as to how to approach the first two.

I just have one more question that I would like someone to respond to. I have the following theorem:

Let m and n be in the set of integers Z with m,n > 1. Then, \mathop n\limits^\_ \in Z has a multiplicative inverse if and only if gcd(m,n) = 1.

Note: The second sentence has n bar, it's probably a little hard to see. The first sentence in the theorem has n just being n, not n bar.

The following question is from my question booklet and I'm wondering if the theorem applies to it in some way. My understanding of n bar is that it is the set of integers z such that z \equiv n\left( {\bmod m} \right). But when I say 'my understanding' I only mean that I know the definition. I'm not really sure at all as to what this means in practice, I'm lacking in suitable examples to work with so any help with the questions would be really good thanks.

Q. Find an inverse for 41 modulo 660, and use it to find the least positive integer x satisfying: 41x \equiv 125\left( {\bmod 660} \right)

Edit: Just one more thing. I have that z_m(z subscript m) denotes the set of all congruence classes modulo m. Does that mean if for example m = 3 then z_m would denote \mathop a\limits^\_ = \left\{ {z \in Z|z \equiv a\left( {\bmod 3} \right)} \right\} or something like that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I've sorted out a few things now so I'll restate my question.

Q. Find an integer r such that 0 <= m < 713 such that 48^{307} \equiv r\left( {\bmod 713} \right).

I don't have problems with questions which ask you to find the LHS. For example find a possible m if m \equiv 482\left( {\bmod 14} \right). However doing the reverse is really giving me probems. Now obviously 48^307 is too large a number for me to just evaluate and repeatedly divide by 713. Is there another way which will enable me to find a possible r?

I thought about rewriting 48^307 as factors, some of which are such that factor \equiv 1\left( {\bmod 713} \right) so that I can simplify the congruence equation. I've also tried expressing 713 in the for bq + r but that hasn't gotten me very fair either. Can someone please help me out?
 
For finding high exponents you can use repeated squaring. Find 48^2, (48^2)^2=48^4, (48^4)^2=48^8,... all mod 713. Then multiply together the appropriate ones to get 307 in the exponent (think of writing 307 in binary). The numbers won't be high as you reduce mod 713 after each squaring.

For finding an inverse of 41 mod 660, you'd like an integer y where 41y\equiv 1\left( {\bmod\ 660} \right). This just means 660 divides 41y-1, so we have another integer z where 660z=41y-1, or 660z-41y=1. Use Euclid's algorithm, it provides a way of writing the gcd of two numbers as a linear combination of those two numbers (in this case gcd(41,660)=1). If you haven't seen this, examples should be easy to find online, or I can provide one if you ask. Use it just like you'd use a normal multiplicative inverse for solving equations.

It looks like you've sorted out the definition of the little bar. If you have any more questions on the notation, theorems, or whatever, please ask.
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K