Moon Perturbations: Learn Differential Gravitational Forces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lewis198
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lunar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perturbations in the Moon's motion due to differential gravitational forces, exploring the complexities of the n-body problem in celestial mechanics and the methods used for predicting planetary coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about resources that detail the perturbations affecting the Moon's motion due to differential gravitational forces.
  • There is a discussion about the challenges of making accurate predictions in a system that can be modeled as an n-body problem, with some participants questioning how predictions can be made given the complexity of the system.
  • One participant notes that the Sun is the primary perturber of the Moon's orbit, affecting its Longitude of Ascending node and Longitude of Perihelion over specific time frames.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while the n-body problem does not have a general solution in elementary functions, it is not insoluble, and various numerical techniques exist to solve the governing differential equations.
  • There is a request for clarification on the specific differential equations involved and the techniques used for numerical solutions.
  • A participant raises the question of whether the n-body problem has been solved and discusses the potential implications of finding a predictive equation for planetary motion.
  • One participant provides the differential equations governing a system of N point masses and mentions the complications introduced by relativistic effects.
  • There is a query about the effectiveness of numerical methods for long-term predictions of body coordinates and whether they are limited to small time intervals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and inquiry regarding the n-body problem and the methods for solving it, indicating that there is no consensus on the effectiveness of numerical methods for long-term predictions or the current state of solutions to the n-body problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of the n-body problem, the dependence on numerical methods for solutions, and the unresolved nature of long-term predictions in celestial mechanics.

lewis198
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I was wondering if you know any web sites that describe perturbations on the moon's motion [due to differential gravitational forces] in detail.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Also, if the sun-moon-earth is effectively 3 body, nay, the whole solar system is n-body, then how can any accurate predictions of planetary coordinates be made?
 
Sorry about the language, I got a bit carried away there.

The universe is just amazing.
 
They are pretty accurate considering that we can sent probes to other worlds.

The Sun is by far the biggest perturber on the Moon's orbit, causing its Longitude of Ascending node to rotate in 18 years, and its Longitude of Perihelion to rotate in 9 years.
 
lewis198 said:
Also, if the sun-moon-earth is effectively 3 body, nay, the whole solar system is n-body, then how can any accurate predictions of planetary coordinates be made?

You are referring to the fact that the n-body problem does not yield a general solution in terms of elementary functions. This does not mean that the n-body problem is insoluble. Most real-world problems do not have simple solutions; the n-body problem is one of them. The differential equations that govern the behavior of the planets are well known. A wide variety of techniques exist to numerically solve differential equations to any desired degree of accuracy.

By way of analogy, even the cumulative normal distribution function [itex]\Phi(x) = 1/\sqrt{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^x \exp(-u^2/2) du[/itex] cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. This does not mean that [itex]\Phi(x)[/itex] is insoluble.

In answer to your first question, I suggest you look at the http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov" website for starters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your replies. What are those differential equations? Also, can you please give me a list of those techniques?
 
Since the recognition that the n body problem is not insoluble, has it been solved? If not, then what advances have been made to obtain a clearer picture?

The last milestone is probably to obtain an equation that predicts the coordinates of an n body system with the current coordinates as the integral constants. This surely would give us an accurate picture of planetary motion, and would revolutionize time-keeping. Using the coordinates of the solar system we could calculate the value of t, the only limitation to this method being the number of observations you would make (other stellar bodies would affect the value of t).
 
Ignoring relativistic effects, the differential equations that govern a system of N point masses are Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation:

[tex]\frac{d^2x_i}{dt^2} = -\sum_{j\ne i}<br /> \frac{G m_j} { ||\vec x_i - \vec x_j||^3 } \, ( \vec x_i - \vec x_j )[/tex]

Things get more complicated with relativistic effects, but its still a set of differential equations.

There is no known equation that solves the N-body problem. So how to solve it? Numerically. A couple of links:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_ordinary_differential_equations"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for that Sir. I will apply myself to studying that.
 
  • #10
Hey wait a minute, are numerical methods useful for predicting body coordinates way out in time? Are numerical methods only useful for approximations for small values of t?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
25K