Motion on 2D surface - particle hanging from string

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two particles connected by a string, with one particle moving on a horizontal table and the other hanging vertically. The task is to derive an expression relating the distance of the first particle from a hole in the table to constants and gravitational effects, using polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on both particles and derive equations of motion in polar coordinates. There are attempts to manipulate these equations to reach the desired form, with some questioning the correctness of their equations and assumptions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and corrections. Some have identified potential errors in sign and formulation, while others are exploring integration techniques and conservation laws relevant to the system.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a previous part of the question that may restrict the methods available for deriving the required expression. Participants are also considering the implications of conservation laws in their reasoning.

Zatman
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Two particles of mass m are connected by a light inextensible string of length l. One of the particles moves on a smooth horizontal table in which there is a small hole. The string passes through the hole so that the second particle hangs vertically below the hole.

Derive the expression

\dot{r}^2 = A - \frac{B}{r^2} - gr

where r is the distance of the first particle from the hole, and A and B are constants. Use the equations of motion for each particle in polar coordinates.

Homework Equations


General acceleration in polar coordinates:

\mathbf{\ddot{r}}=(\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2)\mathbf{\hat{r}}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\dot{\theta}) \mathbf{ \hat{\theta} }


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm using a plane-polar coordinate system in the plane of the table with the origin at the hole. The forces acting on the first particle (on the table) (in the plane) are just the tension, T. So:

-T\mathbf{\hat{r}} = (\ddot{r}-r\dot{\theta}^2)\mathbf{\hat{r}}+(r\ddot{\theta}+2\dot{r}\dot{\theta}) \mathbf{ \hat{\theta} }

And for the hanging particle, the forces are the tension and weight, so (aligning the z axis perpendicular to the table):

(T-mg)\mathbf{\hat{z}} = -m\ddot{r}\mathbf{\hat{z}}

From these equations, I get the following system:

\ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 = -\frac{T}{m}

r\ddot{\theta} + 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta} = 0

\ddot{r} = g - \frac{T}{m}

I've tried manipulating these equations for a while now but don't get anything close to the required form. Are these equations incorrect? I would be very grateful for any hints! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zatman said:
And for the hanging particle, the forces are the tension and weight, so (aligning the z axis perpendicular to the table):

(T-mg)\mathbf{\hat{z}} = -m\ddot{r}\mathbf{\hat{z}}

I believe there is a sign error here. Let ##h## be the distance from the hole to the hanging particle, pointing downward. Clearly, ##h = l - r##. Then ##\ddot h = mg - T ##. ##mg## is positive and ##T## negative because ##h## is chosen to point downward. So ## - \ddot r = mg - T ## or ## \ddot r = T - mg ##.

From these equations, I get the following system:

\ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 = -\frac{T}{m}

r\ddot{\theta} + 2\dot{r}\dot{\theta} = 0

\ddot{r} = g - \frac{T}{m}

The second equation can be integrated. That can also be obtained by recalling conservation laws in a central force field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
voko said:
The second equation can be integrated. That can also be obtained by recalling conservation laws in a central force field.

There was actually a previous part of the question asking for the derivation of the same equation using conservation laws, so I can't use that here. I don't understand how that equation can be integrated.
 
Multiplied by ##r##, it becomes...?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
voko said:
Multiplied by ##r##, it becomes...?

...exact. So this gives:

r^2\dot{\theta} = k

where k is a constant.

Rearranging for \dot{\theta} and substituting into the first equation:

\ddot{r} - r\frac{k^2}{r^4} = \ddot{r} - g

where I have also used the other eqn. to eliminate T. EDIT: just realized this part is wrong, now correcting... This gives

\frac{k^2}{r^3} = g

\frac{k^2}{r^2} = gr

Which is close, but no constant term and no mention of \dot{r}^2 :frown:
 
Last edited:
So I actually get:

\ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 = -\ddot{r} - g

2\ddot{r} - r\dot{\theta}^2 + g = 0

Now substituting \dot{\theta}, from above post:

2\ddot{r} - \frac{k^2}{r^3} + g = 0

2r\ddot{r} - \frac{k^2}{r^2} + gr = 0

So still not correct.
 
That is correct, but not finished. Use the same trick again - but I will let you find the integrating factor this time. The equation you are supposed to derive in the end is a good hint.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh, okay, I've got it now (multiply by \frac{\dot{r}}{r}).

Thank you so much for your help, voko.
 
Have you figured out the part with conservation laws? What law does the integral you found in #5 correspond to?
 
  • #10
Yes, that was conservation of angular momentum, so that k=\frac{L}{m}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K