I Motivating the form of a bra vector

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing the bra vector from a general ket vector in quantum mechanics, emphasizing the normalization condition. It details how to express the bra vector using the basis states and confirms that the inner product must yield a real number. The relationship between the probability amplitudes is established, leading to the conclusion that the amplitude of the bra vector is the complex conjugate of the ket vector's amplitude. The conversation also touches on the implications of complex numbers in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the Hermitian transpose. Overall, the discussion clarifies the mathematical foundations of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics.
LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
How can we write that the amplitude coefficient of bra vector is complex conjugate of ket vector?
Consider a general ket ##|\psi\rangle##, expressed in the ## |\alpha_i\rangle## basis:

$$
|\psi\rangle = \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle,
$$

where## \langle \alpha_i | \alpha_j \rangle = \delta_{ij} ##,
with ## \delta_{ij} ## being the Kronecker delta function, and ## \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle ## being the probability amplitudes.

Now, how do we construct the bra vector ## \langle \psi | ##?

Starting from the normalization condition:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1,
$$

we can expand ## \langle \psi | ## as:

$$
\langle \psi | = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i |.
$$

Substituting this into the normalization:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \bigg( \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \bigg) \bigg( \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle \bigg),
$$

which simplifies to:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle = 1.
$$

Since the right-hand side (RHS) is a real number, the left-hand side (LHS) must also be real:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle \in \mathbb{R}.
$$

From this, how do we conclude that:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle^* \tag{1}
$$

In classical physics, dot products are commutative, so ##\vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = \vec{b} \cdot \vec{a} ## and both are real. Analogously, if ## \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \in \mathbb{R} ##, we could conclude ##\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle##.

However, in the general case where these are complex numbers, we can use ##1##.

But is this the only justification for these rules? Or can we expand more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need two hashes to delimit inline latex.

[Note -- OP's LaTeX fixed now by the Mentors]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's by the definition of the inner product. In linear algebra, the dot product of complex vectors is
$$a^Hb$$
where H denotes the Hermitian transpose (complex conjugate transpose). This carries directly to the bra-ket inner product <a|b>. You could also have deduced this from your normalization expression for unit complex vectors,
$$\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1$$
which requires a complex conjugation to be true.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...