I Motivating the form of a bra vector

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
How can we write that the amplitude coefficient of bra vector is complex conjugate of ket vector?
Consider a general ket ##|\psi\rangle##, expressed in the ## |\alpha_i\rangle## basis:

$$
|\psi\rangle = \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle,
$$

where## \langle \alpha_i | \alpha_j \rangle = \delta_{ij} ##,
with ## \delta_{ij} ## being the Kronecker delta function, and ## \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle ## being the probability amplitudes.

Now, how do we construct the bra vector ## \langle \psi | ##?

Starting from the normalization condition:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1,
$$

we can expand ## \langle \psi | ## as:

$$
\langle \psi | = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i |.
$$

Substituting this into the normalization:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \bigg( \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \bigg) \bigg( \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle \bigg),
$$

which simplifies to:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle = 1.
$$

Since the right-hand side (RHS) is a real number, the left-hand side (LHS) must also be real:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle \in \mathbb{R}.
$$

From this, how do we conclude that:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle^* \tag{1}
$$

In classical physics, dot products are commutative, so ##\vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = \vec{b} \cdot \vec{a} ## and both are real. Analogously, if ## \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \in \mathbb{R} ##, we could conclude ##\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle##.

However, in the general case where these are complex numbers, we can use ##1##.

But is this the only justification for these rules? Or can we expand more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need two hashes to delimit inline latex.

[Note -- OP's LaTeX fixed now by the Mentors]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's by the definition of the inner product. In linear algebra, the dot product of complex vectors is
$$a^Hb$$
where H denotes the Hermitian transpose (complex conjugate transpose). This carries directly to the bra-ket inner product <a|b>. You could also have deduced this from your normalization expression for unit complex vectors,
$$\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1$$
which requires a complex conjugation to be true.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top