Motivating the form of a bra vector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the construction of the bra vector ##\langle \psi |## from a general ket ##|\psi\rangle## expressed in the ##|\alpha_i\rangle## basis. It establishes that the inner product must satisfy the normalization condition ##\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1##, leading to the conclusion that ##\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle^*##. This relationship is derived from the properties of complex numbers and the definition of the inner product in linear algebra, specifically the Hermitian transpose. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of complex conjugation in ensuring the validity of the normalization condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and bra-ket notation
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly inner products
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Experience with normalization conditions in vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of complex conjugation in quantum states
  • Explore the relationship between bra-ket notation and linear transformations
  • Investigate the role of normalization in quantum mechanics and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states and their representations.

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
How can we write that the amplitude coefficient of bra vector is complex conjugate of ket vector?
Consider a general ket ##|\psi\rangle##, expressed in the ## |\alpha_i\rangle## basis:

$$
|\psi\rangle = \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle,
$$

where## \langle \alpha_i | \alpha_j \rangle = \delta_{ij} ##,
with ## \delta_{ij} ## being the Kronecker delta function, and ## \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle ## being the probability amplitudes.

Now, how do we construct the bra vector ## \langle \psi | ##?

Starting from the normalization condition:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1,
$$

we can expand ## \langle \psi | ## as:

$$
\langle \psi | = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i |.
$$

Substituting this into the normalization:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \bigg( \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \bigg) \bigg( \sum \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle |\alpha_i\rangle \bigg),
$$

which simplifies to:

$$
\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \sum \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle = 1.
$$

Since the right-hand side (RHS) is a real number, the left-hand side (LHS) must also be real:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle \in \mathbb{R}.
$$

From this, how do we conclude that:

$$
\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle^* \tag{1}
$$

In classical physics, dot products are commutative, so ##\vec{a} \cdot \vec{b} = \vec{b} \cdot \vec{a} ## and both are real. Analogously, if ## \langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle \in \mathbb{R} ##, we could conclude ##\langle \psi | \alpha_i \rangle = \langle \alpha_i | \psi \rangle##.

However, in the general case where these are complex numbers, we can use ##1##.

But is this the only justification for these rules? Or can we expand more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need two hashes to delimit inline latex.

[Note -- OP's LaTeX fixed now by the Mentors]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's by the definition of the inner product. In linear algebra, the dot product of complex vectors is
$$a^Hb$$
where H denotes the Hermitian transpose (complex conjugate transpose). This carries directly to the bra-ket inner product <a|b>. You could also have deduced this from your normalization expression for unit complex vectors,
$$\langle \psi | \psi \rangle = 1$$
which requires a complex conjugation to be true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K