# What is Bra-ket: Definition and 62 Discussions

In quantum mechanics, bra–ket notation, or Dirac notation, is ubiquitous. The notation uses the angle brackets, "

{\displaystyle \langle }
" and "

{\displaystyle \rangle }
", and a vertical bar "

|

{\displaystyle |}
", to construct "bras" and "kets" .
A ket looks like "

|

v

{\displaystyle |v\rangle }
". Mathematically it denotes a vector,

v

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {v}}}
, in an abstract (complex) vector space

V

{\displaystyle V}
, and physically it represents a state of some quantum system.
A bra looks like "

f

|

{\displaystyle \langle f|}
", and mathematically it denotes a linear form

f
:
V

C

{\displaystyle f:V\to \mathbb {C} }
, i.e. a linear map that maps each vector in

V

{\displaystyle V}
to a number in the complex plane

C

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }
. Letting the linear functional

f

|

{\displaystyle \langle f|}
act on a vector

|

v

{\displaystyle |v\rangle }
is written as

f

|

v

C

{\displaystyle \langle f|v\rangle \in \mathbb {C} }
.
Assume on

V

{\displaystyle V}
exists an inner product

(

,

)

{\displaystyle (\cdot ,\cdot )}
with antilinear first argument, which makes

V

{\displaystyle V}
a Hilbert space. Then with this inner product each vector

ϕ

|

ϕ

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\phi }}\equiv |\phi \rangle }
can be identified with a corresponding linear form, by placing the vector in the anti-linear first slot of the inner product:

(

ϕ

,

)

ϕ

|

{\displaystyle ({\boldsymbol {\phi }},\cdot )\equiv \langle \phi |}
. The correspondence between these notations is then

(

ϕ

,

ψ

)

ϕ

|

ψ

{\displaystyle ({\boldsymbol {\phi }},{\boldsymbol {\psi }})\equiv \langle \phi |\psi \rangle }
. The linear form

ϕ

|

{\displaystyle \langle \phi |}
is a covector to

|

ϕ

{\displaystyle |\phi \rangle }
, and the set of all covectors form a subspace of the dual vector space

V

{\displaystyle V^{\vee }}
, to the initial vector space

V

{\displaystyle V}
. The purpose of this linear form

ϕ

|

{\displaystyle \langle \phi |}
can now be understood in terms of making projections on the state

ϕ

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\phi }}}
, to find how linearly dependent two states are, etc.
For the vector space

C

n

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}
, kets can be identified with column vectors, and bras with row vectors. Combinations of bras, kets, and operators are interpreted using matrix multiplication. If

C

n

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}
has the standard hermitian inner product

(

v

,

w

)
=

v

w

{\displaystyle ({\boldsymbol {v}},{\boldsymbol {w}})=v^{\dagger }w}
, under this identification, the identification of kets and bras and vice versa provided by the inner product is taking the Hermitian conjugate (denoted

{\displaystyle \dagger }
).
It is common to suppress the vector or linear form from the bra–ket notation and only use a label inside the typography for the bra or ket. For example, the spin operator

σ
^

z

{\displaystyle {\hat {\sigma }}_{z}}
on a two dimensional space

Δ

{\displaystyle \Delta }
of spinors, has eigenvalues

±

{\displaystyle \pm }
½ with eigenspinors

ψ

+

,

ψ

Δ

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\psi }}_{+},{\boldsymbol {\psi }}_{-}\in \Delta }
. In bra-ket notation one typically denotes this as

ψ

+

=

|

+

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\psi }}_{+}=|+\rangle }
, and

ψ

=

|

{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\psi }}_{-}=|-\rangle }
. Just as above, kets and bras with the same label are interpreted as kets and bras corresponding to each other using the inner product. In particular when also identified with row and column vectors, kets and bras with the same label are identified with Hermitian conjugate column and row vectors.
Bra–ket notation was effectively established in 1939 by Paul Dirac and is thus also known as the Dirac notation. (Still, the bra-ket notation has a precursor in Hermann Grassmann's use of the notation

[
ϕ

ψ
]

{\displaystyle [\phi {\mid }\psi ]}
for his inner products nearly 100 years earlier.)

View More On Wikipedia.org
1. ### I Bra-Ket Notation Manipulations: Quantum State Expansion

I suspect it will help if you know about my background: I did some linear algebra in university but never used it and am now in my mid 60s. I am interested in understanding the mathematics of quantum physics. I have read a number of layman's texts on quantum mechanics, but they all gloss over...
2. ### I Question on bra vs ket notation

What's the difference between a bra vector and ket vector in specifying spin states except for notational convenience when calculating probablility amplitudes? Are they equivalent?
3. ### I What is unique about the bra in Dirac bra-ket notation?

It's said that every ket has a unique bra. For any vector ##|v> ∈ V## there is a unique bra ##<v| ∈ V*##. I'm not sure what that means. What is unique? Can anyone please help me understand. Thank you
4. ### Griffiths Problem 3.35. Harmonic Oscillator, Bra-ket notation

Firstly, apologies for the latex as the preview option is not working for me. I will fix mistakes after posting. So for ##<x>## = (##\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}##) ##(< \alpha | a_{+} + a_{-}| \alpha >)## = (##\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}##) ##< a_{-} \alpha | \alpha> + <\alpha | a_{-}...
5. ### Bra-ket of uncertainty commutator (Sakurai 1.18)

It's easy to show that ##[\Delta A, \Delta B] = [A,B]##. I'm specifically having issues with evaluating the bra-ket on the RHS of the uncertainty relation: ##\langle \alpha |[A,B]|\alpha\rangle = \langle \alpha |\Delta A \Delta B - \Delta B \Delta A|\alpha\rangle## The answer is supposed to be...
6. ### Question on correctly interpreting a bra-ket equation

I am trying to solve for the uncertainty in energy ##\Delta E## in the following exercise: $$\Delta E = \sqrt{\langle \Phi | (\hat H - \bar E )^2 | \Phi \rangle}$$ Questions What does ##(\hat H - \bar E )^2## mean? Is it a simple binomial expansion into ##\hat H^2 - 2 \bar E \hat H + \bar...
7. ### I Berry phase, Bra-Ket and gradient

Could somebody show me how to derive this equation? How can I get right side from left. Step by step, thanks...
8. ### Quantum polarisation probability

Homework Statement I am stuck on the second paragraph but I thought I would add the first paragraph in case some context would help! Homework Equations |A> = cos(theta)|H> + sin(theta)|V> The Attempt at a Solution I am not wholly comfortable with bra-ket notation with the outer product p =...
9. ### I Understanding Scalar Quantity in Basic Bra-Ket Arithmetic

Say I have a vector product |x+a⟩⟨x| and I multiplied it by a ket vector |x'⟩. Can I pull the |x'⟩ into the ket vector |x+a⟩? also could you split up the ket vector |x+a⟩ into two ket vectors added together?
10. ### I Understanding Bra-Ket Notation in Quantum Mechanics

In my lecture notes, it says that ##\left\langle l \right| A_{nm} \left| \psi \right\rangle = \sum_{n,m} A_{nm} \left\langle m \right| \left|\psi \right\rangle \left\langle l \right| \left| n \right\rangle## ##=\sum_{n,m} A_{nm}\left\langle m \right| \left| \psi \right\rangle \delta_{ln}## ##=...
11. ### Eigenvalue and eigenvectors, bra-ket

Question Consider the matrix $$\left[ \matrix { 0&0&-1+i \\ 0&3&0 \\ -1-i&0&0 } \right]$$ (a) Find the eigenvalues and normalized eigenvectors of A. Denote the eigenvectors of A by |a1>, |a2>, |a3>. Any degenerate eigenvalues? (b) Show that the eigenvectors |a1>, |a2>, |a3> form an...
12. ### Adjoint operator in bra-ket notation

Hi! First of all I want apologize for my bad english! Second, I'm doing a physical chemystry course about the main concepts of quantum mechanics ! The Professor has given to me this definition of "the adjoint operator": <φ|Aψ> = <A†φ|ψ> My purpose is to verificate this equivalence so i...
13. ### How to Represent Eigenvectors in Column Matrix Form Using Bra-Ket Notation?

I'm new to bra-ket notation and am slightly confused; given an infinite square well with eigenvectors: \phi = \sqrt{2/a}\sin( (n\pi x)/a) And we assume the form: H |φ> = E_n |φ> How would you then represent φ in terms of a column matrix, because that what I thought |φ> represents. Given...
14. ### Bra-Ket Notation, Wave Equation, Particle States

Homework Statement A particle is in the state |\psi \rangle = \frac{1}{{\sqrt 3 }}|U\rangle + \frac{{a\sqrt {(2)} }}{{\sqrt {(3)} }}i|D\rangle . The up state |U\rangle = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1\\ 0 \end{array}} \right) and the down state |D\rangle = \left(...
15. ### Schwarz inequality with bra-ket notation

Homework Statement Homework EquationsThe Attempt at a Solution Hello, I just want to make sure I am doing this right $$<a|b> = a_{x}^{*}b_{x} + a_{y}^{*}b_{y} + a_{z}^{*}b_{z}$$ $$= [(1-i)|x>][-i|x>] + (2 |y>)(-3 |y>) + (0|z>)(|z>)$$ $$=(-i + i^{2})|x> - 6 |y> + 0|z>$$ =(-1-i)|x> - 6 |y>...
16. ### I'm having some trouble understanding bra-ket notation?

I have been studying quantum physics for some time, yet I still cannot seem to understand the principles behind bra-ket notation (especially how spin states are described and the probabilities/eigenvalues). It would be great if someone could give me a basic explanation and/or maybe recommend...
17. ### Exploring Quantum Mechanics: Bra-Ket Representation & Completeness Relation

I'm new to the concepts of quanum mechanics and the bra-ket representation in general. I've seen in the textbook that the compleatness relation is used all the time when working with the bra and kets. I'm a bit confused about how this relation is being used when applied more than once in a...
18. ### Quantum Mechanics , bra-ket , angular momentum eigenkets, eigenvalues

I have a question on the algebra involved in bra-ket notation, eigenvalues of \hat{J}_{z}, \hat{J}^{2} and the ladder operators \hat{J}_{\pm} The question has asked me to neglect terms from O(ε^{4}) I am using the following eigenvalue, eigenfunction results, where ljm\rangle is a...
19. ### Show that the dot product is linear: Bra-ket notation

Homework Statement Show that the dot product in two-dimensional space is linear: <u|(|v> + |w>) = <u|v> + <u|w> The Attempt at a Solution I feel like I'm missing some grasp of the concept here ... I would think to just distribute the <u| and be done in that one step, but I'm being...
20. ### Quick question about bra-ket notation

Homework Statement On Wikipedia there is an article about perturbation theory. To understand something I need to understand the following relation. They say: Homework Equations H |n> = E_n |n> So: <n| H = <n| E_n H is Hermitian. So: Why is this? The Attempt at a Solution...
21. ### Changing bases (with bra-ket notation)

http://i.imgur.com/ORtBJdT.jpg i don't understand why the old base is written in terms/as a linear combination of the new bases. wouldn't i want to map my coordinates from old to new not new to old?.. here's what my textbook says about it, can you guys interpret this for me, i still don't...
22. ### Bra-ket notation and other linear algebra stuff

forgive the messiness; i take bad notes in class. http://i.imgur.com/VmW8Ubg.jpg towards the middle of the page where it says "this is equivalent to..." and then my professor wrote what follows but i thought the row vector should be complex conjugates? ie, the red writings are not actually...
23. ### What is the significance of complex conjugates in Bra-ket notation?

so I'm fine with the kets, e.g, |a>.. but i don't understand what the bras are. the kets are basically just a column vector right? ie the components (with the direction) of the vector being described. but what is the bra? this was given to us in class: <a|=a1<e1|+a2<e2|= (a1* a2*) (where e1...
24. ### [QM] Help understanding this bra-ket solution

Hello, I am working my way though Sakurai's book on Quantum MEchanics and am having some problems understanding the bra-ket notation. I keep believing I understand everything there is to it but then he will do something in a single line that I cannot understand. This is one of them. If...
25. ### Expectation values of Kin energy in Bra-Ket notation

Homework Statement Confirm explicitly that ##\frac{1}{2m}\langle \hat{p}_x \Psi | \hat{p}_x \Psi \rangle## cannot be negative. Homework Equations ##-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \hat{p}_x## The Attempt at a Solution i seem to get: ##\frac{1}{2m}\langle \hat{p}_x \Psi | \hat{p}_x...
26. ### Bra-ket notation and qubit issue.

I am having trouble understanding the following: Uf: |x>|y> → |x>|y \oplusf(x)> \oplus being a mod 2 operation (nand)? I suppose I don't understand how to read the "ket" states so well. As far as I understand we have that since x and y can be 0,1 only if |x=1>|y=1> then if f(x) = 1 then...
27. ### Finding Eigenvectors/values given matrix defined by bra-ket notation

Homework Statement sorry about the lack of LaTex but I don't know how to do bra-ket notation in tex vectors |1> and |2> are a complete set of normalized basis vectors. the hamiltonian is defined as |1><1|-|2><2|+|1><2|+|2><1| find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in ters of |1> and |2>Homework...
28. ### A little Bra-Ket notation theorem that I don't get

I'm continuing through Dirac's book, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. You can view this as a google book in the link below. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=...page&q&f=false On page 28-29 he proves this Theorem: If ξ is a real linear operator and ξm|P> = 0 (1) for a...
29. ### Bra-Ket Question: Constructing Langle Alpha & Beta

Homework Statement Consider a three-dimensional vector space spanned by an orthonormal basis |1\rangle, |2 \rangle, |3 \rangle . Kets |\alpha \rangle, |\beta \rangle are given by |\alpha \rangle = i|1\rangle -2|2 \rangle -i|3\rangle, \qquad |\beta \rangle = i|1\rangle +2 |3\rangle. part...
30. ### Analytical Bra-Ket Tensor Products: Rules & Wolfram Mathematica

What are the rules of analytical – not numerical (matrix) entry of bra-ket convertion – operations on bra-ket, in particular – tensor product ? For example – how in analytical form to do this: U|\Psi\rangle where: U=I\otimesI I=|0\rangle\langle0|+|1\rangle\langle1|...
31. ### Complex operations, bra-ket notation, confusion

Sorry for disregarding the template; I'm not really working out a homework problem as much as just trying to follow the reasoning in the text. I'm working through the first chapter of Quantum Mechanics, McIntyre, and I'm a little bit confused by the following. The text introduces bra-ket...
32. ### Solving Bra-Ket Equations: Hermitian Operators & Real Numbers

bra - ket?? Hi, maybe a stupid question, but i would like to know if, if We have a real number, but we are i a vector space, and the operator is hermitian, is |a> is equal to < a |*? i assume this, because if a is the vector (1,0) (spin up), and only real entries. im trying to make...
33. ### What does the operator C^3 represent in Bra-ket notation?

Hi If C is an operator such that C|1> = |1> and C|2>=|2>, then C^3 |1>= |1>|1>|1> =|1> ^ 3 ? If yes, then what does this C^3 represent? :confused:
34. ### Mastering Bra-ket Notation: Frustrations with Quantum Mechanics Lectures

I'm a little frustrated with the quantum m lectures I've been watching. I've watched Susskind's, one in India and now James Binney's, as well as read about 3 books. They all teach this Bra-ket notation and in none of the three books I have on worked problems do they every give you a chance to...
35. ### Bra-ket notation to Matrix for entangled pairs

I am confused about the the notation |ab> for an entangled pair. Isn't this the same as the tensor product |a> \otimes |b>? If so, I run into another confusion when using the corresponding matrices. I read that I should apply a Hadamard operator H twice to the input state |01>. Does this mean...
36. ### Quantum physics problem- Bra-Ket notation and operators

Hello all, Homework Statement I’m trying to derive a result from a book on quantum mechanics but I have trouble with bra-ket notation and operators… Let’s say we have a photon moving along the cartesian z-axis. It is polarized and its state is Psi(theta) = cos (theta) x1 + sin(theta) x1...
37. ### Mastering Basic Bra-Ket Algebra: Tips and Techniques for Solving Problems

Hi guys, I'm having some trouble with bra-ket algebra. For example, our lecturer did on the board, <Sx+|Sz|Sx+> So what I would do is, ignoring any factors of 1/sqrt(2) or 1/2 or hbar. Sx+ = |+> + |-> Sz = |+><+|-|-><-| => ( |+> + |-> )(|+><+|-|-><-|)( |+> + |->) This is...
38. ### Exponential of an operator into bra-ket notation

Homework Statement The question is to evaluate the expression e^-iA, where A is a Hermitian operator whose eigenvalues are known (but not given) using bra-ket algebra. Homework Equations See above. The Attempt at a Solution I have been looking around, reading the textbook and...
39. ### My bra-ket calcs seem to be going wrong - help

What am I doing wrong here? Let \psi be a ket whose representation in the X basis is given by \psi(x)\ =\ \langle x|\psi\rangle\ =\ e^{-x^{2}/2} Then \psi(-x)\ =\ \langle -x|\psi\rangle\ =\ e^{-x^{2}/2}\ = \psi(x) (1) But we also have: \psi(-x)\ =\ \langle -x|\psi\rangle (2) \ =\...
40. ### Solving Quick Bra-Ket Question: |t> + |a> = 45°

|t> + |a> = ?? As an angle from the transition axis now I know it is 45 degrees is the answer but I am not sure what |t> or |a> equals. I know |theta> = cos theta |t> + sin theta |a> so how do I go from here? Does |t> = cos^2 theta and |a> = sin^2 theta? Thanks. Stephen
41. ### Bra-ket notation Schrodinger Equation

This is a pretty trivial question, but how is the Schrodinger equation written out in full, time dependency and all in Dirac notation? I'm interested in this from a purely aesthetic point of view but I'm also a bit confused as to what the bras and the kets really are.
42. ### Evaluating a term in bra-ket notation

Hi, i am evaluating the integral \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dE \langle p'|E \rangle \langle E| e^{-iEt/ \hbar} |p\rangle However, i am unsure how to evaluate \langle E| e^{-iEt/ \hbar} |p\rangle . I am not sure if it is simply e^{-iEt/ \hbar} \times \langle E|p\rangle or something else. Any...
43. ### Computing operator in bra-ket within momentum space

Homework Statement <e^{ip'x}|x^{2}|e^{ipx}> Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution Its pretty obvious that its difficult to integrate in position-space, so I rewrite x in momentum space (i.e. the second-order differential operator with respect to p). If that is...
44. ### Very Basic questions on bra-ket notation

Hello, i am a beginner in quantum mechanics and i have those basic questions on the bra-ket notation: Which dimension has a ket | \phi > describing a state normally? Maybe \quad C ^n? Which dimension has a bra-ket <\psi | \phi >then? Maybe \quad C ? How do you get the matrix...
45. ### Adjoint of a Bra-Ket: Definition & Derivation

Hello everybody, why is the adjoint of a bra-ket like this: < \phi | \psi >^+ = < \psi | \phi > Is it a definition or can it be derived somehow? Thanks :)
46. ### A Little Trick for bra-ket notation over the Reals

We know that < \phi | \psi >* = < \psi | \phi > where * denotes the complex conj. so if \psi and \phi are ordinary real valued functions (as opposed to matrices or complex valued whatevers) can we also say: < \phi | \psi > = < 1 |\phi \psi > = <\phi \psi | 1> Or what if \phi = \psi...
47. ### Novice Guide to Understanding Bra-ket Notation

I am new to qm and very new to bra-ket notation. If you, as a physicist, saw this: |\phi>=\Sigma(\sqrt{\Lambda_n}|x=x_n>) what would you understand about the system it is describing?
48. ### 1/2-system bra-ket manipulation

Homework Statement I've solved my problem now. I was trying to show that LHS=RHS: (|+><-| + |-><+|)^2 = (|+><+| + |-><-|) this can be done by using <-|->=1 (normalization) and <x|->=0 (orthogonal). LHS: (|+><-||+><-|) + (|+><-||-><+|) + (|-><+||+><-|) + (|-><+||-><+|) = 0 + |+><+| + |-><-|...
49. ### Need help with bra-ket algebra? Check out these resources!

Hey physicists! I'm having trouble getting my head around bra-ket algebra and was wondering if anyone knows any problems/worked solutions to help me understand it. Either that or some tutorial resources. Thanks, Andrew
50. ### What is the Purpose of Bra-Ket Notation in Physics?

Question is in attachment The Attempt at a Solution i) < 5 | 3 > ii) G < 3 | 3 > iii) (Lz)/2 < 5 | 5 >