Motocross: Physics of the Scrub

  • Thread starter Thread starter bdub_24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Scrubbing over jumps in motocross is faster than jumping upright due to the flatter trajectory it creates, which reduces flight time. Mathematical proof indicates that a flatter jump allows for greater forward speed, as higher jumps require more vertical angle and reduce horizontal velocity. The technique, exemplified by James Stewart's "Bubba Scrub," emphasizes staying low and flat for optimal speed. Discussions highlight the importance of understanding the physics involved in motocross techniques, suggesting that mastering scrubbing can significantly improve performance. Overall, scrubbing is a critical skill for achieving faster lap times in motocross.
bdub_24
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Motocross: Physics of the "Scrub"

I was wondering why scrubbing over a jump proves to be faster than hitting the jump upright. James Stewart and many others have given poor, a likely false, explanations and some have provided logical explanations, but I wanted to see mathematical proof as to why it works.

I've attached a proof that I believe is pretty strong, but please check it out for yourself and let me know if there is anything wrong with it.

I was surprised to see in my example scenario the substantial difference in speed and time that comes from the technique.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 915
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 836
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 803
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what scrubbing means, it looks like it is flying over a flatter trajectory. Flatness determines how fast the flight ends: the flatter it is, the less time it takes. If two trajectories start and end at the same points, but one is flatter than another, then the flatter trajectory is faster. Unless I grossly misinterpret the meaning of "scrub", that's all there is to it.
 
bdub_24 said:
I was wondering why scrubbing over a jump proves to be faster than hitting the jump upright. James Stewart and many others have given poor, a likely false, explanations and some have provided logical explanations, but I wanted to see mathematical proof as to why it works.

I've attached a proof that I believe is pretty strong, but please check it out for yourself and let me know if there is anything wrong with it.

I was surprised to see in my example scenario the substantial difference in speed and time that comes from the technique.

I found that for scrubbing

Staying low and flat are the staples of Stewart’s technique, and when done correctly the Bubba Scrub is the fastest way to fly, bar none.

http://motocross.transworld.net/1000014563/photos/tuesday-tip-the-bubba-scrub/

As voko said, when you go higher, you need more time. Because if the speed of the motorcycle is the same in both cases, to jump higher you need to jump at greater angle and the forward speed will be less.

\mathtt{V_{forward}\ =\ \ V_{0}\cos{\alpha} }

Physik_Flugbahn_vs_Abwurfwinkel_en.gif







So you will be faster with scrubbing.
 
  • Like
Likes RaulTheUCSCSlug
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top