Moving from experimental to theoretical

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concerns of a fourth-year physics student regarding the transition from experimental to theoretical physics, particularly in the context of pursuing graduate studies. The student is currently engaged in an experimental project and is seeking advice on how this may impact their chances of being accepted into a theoretical physics master's program, given their limited exposure to theoretical courses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that maintaining high marks and obtaining good recommendations could allow the student to be considered for a theoretical master's program despite their experimental background.
  • Others note that it is common for undergraduate students not to take advanced theoretical courses like string theory or quantum field theory, which may not hinder graduate applications.
  • A participant mentions that a thesis-based Master's is generally viewed more favorably for those intending to pursue a Ph.D. in Canada.
  • There is a discussion about the possibility of starting in a Master's program and later transferring to a Ph.D. program at some Canadian institutions.
  • Some participants emphasize that having programming skills can enhance the student's attractiveness for theoretical positions.
  • Anecdotal evidence is provided by participants who successfully transitioned from experimental to theoretical work, suggesting that such a switch is feasible.
  • Concerns are expressed by the original poster about choosing an honours project that may limit future opportunities in theoretical physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a strong academic record and recommendations are important for graduate school applications, but there are multiple perspectives on the impact of an experimental background on entering theoretical physics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

There are varying opinions on the expectations for research experience when entering a Master's program, and the discussion includes personal experiences that may not reflect broader trends or requirements across different institutions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for undergraduate physics students considering graduate studies in theoretical physics, particularly those with a background in experimental work or limited access to theoretical courses.

CoreyJKelly
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm currently a fourth year physics student, working on my honours degree. The school that I'm at has almost no research happening in theoretical physics, but I've always been more interested in theoretical than experimental physics. For my honours project, I'll be working on something completely experimental (leaning slightly towards biophysics) and I'm wondering if by doing this, I'll be completely eliminating any chance of getting into a grad school for theoretical work. I'm taking courses on quantum mechanics and general relativity, but my school doesn't offer anything such as string theory or quantum field theory. If I can keep my marks high in the courses that I am taking, is it possible that a supervisor will still consider me for a master's degree in a field that I have no experience in?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CoreyJKelly said:
Hi all,

I'm currently a fourth year physics student, working on my honours degree. The school that I'm at has almost no research happening in theoretical physics, but I've always been more interested in theoretical than experimental physics. For my honours project, I'll be working on something completely experimental (leaning slightly towards biophysics) and I'm wondering if by doing this, I'll be completely eliminating any chance of getting into a grad school for theoretical work. I'm taking courses on quantum mechanics and general relativity, but my school doesn't offer anything such as string theory or quantum field theory. If I can keep my marks high in the courses that I am taking, is it possible that a supervisor will still consider me for a master's degree in a field that I have no experience in?

Thanks!

I don't think that there should be a problem getting into grad school for theoretical physics if you have good marks and good recommendations.

Where are you?

In North America, although there are some undergrad courses in quantum field theory and string theory, I think it more typical that someone would not take courses in these subjects during the course of their bachelor's degree.
 
I'm at Memorial University of Newfoundland. I suppose it is true that the type of courses I had mentioned are usually offered at a graduate level, so it won't be unusual that I haven't taken them.
Thanks for the advice! I'm also looking for opinions on what it's like to do a coursework master's as opposed to purely research. From my understanding, many schools require that you do research while taking a certain number of graduate-level courses. Is there anything I should know if I'm given the choice to do one or the other?
 
Are you planning to stay in Canada for grad school?

In Canada, doing a thesis Master's looks better than doing a purely course work Master's if you plan to go on to a Ph.D. If you plan on doing your Master's and Ph.D at the same school, than it might be OK to do a coursework Master's. At some Canadian schools, you can start in a Master's programme and transfer into the Ph.D. programme without first getting a Ph.D. You might even be able to start in Ph.D. programme, but I've been out of school a long time, so I'm not sure.

If you do grad school in the U.S., I think it is typical to get a Master's if one does not want to finish the Ph.D., but this should be confirmed by people more familiar with the U.S. system than am I.
 
Generally you start with coursework and progress into research - although some schools allow you to start concurrently. I agree with the advice above. An undergraduate degree is about establishing a foundation. You won't be expected to have significant research experience coming into an M.Sc. program (that's not to say that it won't help).
 
Staying in Canada is likely, but I'm applying to a few schools in the U.S. as well. I do plan on continuing to a Ph.D., so I'll keep that in mind while sorting out my programme. Thanks so much for the advice!
 
George Jones said:
At some Canadian schools, you can start in a Master's programme and transfer into the Ph.D. programme without first getting a Ph.D.

This should read

"At some Canadian schools, you can start in a Master's programme and transfer into the Ph.D. programme without first getting a Master's."

What did you think of Hartle as a text?

Good luck!
 
I'm starting GR in the winter... I've got the text now so that I can pre-read and hopefully get ahead on the material... it seems to be reasonably well put together, but I've got little basis for comparison, haha
 
How are your programming skills? Having a computer on your swiss army knife would help to make you attractive for some theory positions.

Having a background in experiment won't harm your chances of doing graduate work in theory. I used to share an office with a guy who made exactly the switch that you are contemplating.

The coursework you do for your MSc (and when in your program you take it) will largely be up to you and your supervisor to decide on.
 
  • #10
I've taken 3 or 4 university-level programming courses, two of which were specifically for programming to solve physics problems. I also do a fair bit of programming in the lab that I work in now. Glad to know this will come in handy!
 
  • #11
I have been a little reluctant to use this example, because it happened some time ago.

My supervisor, now "retired", did an experimental Master's, and then switched to theory for his Ph.D. He's an elected Fellow of the American Physical Society and a Past Chair of the Theoretical Division of the Canadian Association of Physicists.

I'm not advocating that you do a Master's in experimental physics, do theory from the start if that's what you want, but this example shows that the transition from experiment to theory (and probably the other way, too), at least in the past, could be made successfully at a fairly late stage.
 
  • #12
I did a Bachelors in physics and a Masters in theoretical physics then another Masters in experimental optics before getting a PhD in theoretical condensed matter.

Going back and forth is not out of the realm of possibilities.

Right now I work in both areas, theory and experiment.
 
  • #13
I appreciate all the posts! I've been somewhat distraught in deciding on an honours project, because I was worried that I might be laying the first stone in a path that I really didn't want to go down.. haha... not that I don't enjoy experiment, but I'm really interested in a lot of the newer theoretical physics happening in the world right now, and I'd love to be involved in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K