Moving the graph to the right -- What do you think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0kelvin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of graph translation in calculus, particularly how moving a function to the right or left is represented mathematically. The user explores the implications of the transformation f(x - n) and relates it to composite functions, emphasizing the connection between graph equations and their translations on the x-y plane. An example is provided using a piecewise function to illustrate how the transformation affects the function's output. Additionally, a physics analogy is drawn with wave disturbances, demonstrating how a function can represent a traveling wave. Overall, the discussion seeks to deepen the understanding of graph translations beyond standard textbook explanations.
0kelvin
Messages
50
Reaction score
5
I'm studying calculus alone with textbooks. The part about moving the graphs to the right or to the left struck me because they just have a list of rules, properties and make you relate the graph with the corresponding equation. I know what is the rate of change and I thought I could do better than the textbook.

I vectorized this to explain why: f(x - n) moves the parabola to the right.

func_sideways.png

Not satisfied I though. f(x - 2) does remind me of the concept of a composite function. Can I draw something to explain this and relate it to the rate of change?

translation2.png
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With a graph described with an equation ##f(x,y)=0## given, another graph
f(x-a,y-b)=0
is a translation of that graph with vector (a,b) on x-y plane. For an example say (0,0) is on the original graph, it is translated to (a,b) on the new one.
 
Last edited:
0kelvin said:
I'm studying calculus alone with textbooks. The part about moving the graphs to the right or to the left struck me because they just have a list of rules, properties and make you relate the graph with the corresponding equation. I know what is the rate of change and I thought I could do better than the textbook.
Take a function that is zero everywhere except the origin:$$f(x)=\begin{cases} 1 & x = 0 \\ 0 & x \ne 0 \end{cases}$$Now define ##g(x) = f(x -2)##. Note that ##g(2) = f(0) = 1##, hence:$$g(x)=\begin{cases} 1 & x = 2 \\ 0 & x \ne 2 \end{cases}$$And we see that ##g(x)## is ##f(x)## moved to the right.
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
Here's a related example from physics: a traveling wave disturbance on a string.

Suppose a disturbance has a profile F(x) along a string.
[In physicist's notation...]
F(x-vt) describes that disturbance translating (traveling without distortion) to the right with constant velocity v.

At t=0, consider the disturbance at the string location x=1: F(1).
After a time t, F(1)=F(x-vt) where 1=x-vt.
Since t increases, x must increase to keep x-vt=1. (Indeed, x=vt+1.)
...and similarly for other locations.
Thus, the disturbance moves to the right.

See https://www.desmos.com/calculator/bjt6dleg5h
from
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...mean-in-the-wave-equation.836348/post-5254546
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top