(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Fact:The ring of integersZis totally ordered: for any distinct elementsaandbinZ, eithera>bora<b.

Fact:The ring of integers is discrete, in the sense that for any elementainZ, there exists an elementbinZsuch that there is no elementcinZwitha<c<b, and the same argument holds with the greater than signs flipped. In other words, successors and predecessors exist inZ(but not inR, for example).

Observation:InZ, the multiplicative identity 1 is the successor of the additive identity 0.

Questions:Is this fact a coincidence? Does this have any significance? Must the multiplicative identity always succeed the additive identity in rings that have the same properties asZ, assuming there are any other?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Multiplicative and additive identities as successors

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Multiplicative additive identities | Date |
---|---|

Matrix multiplication to addition | Jun 27, 2013 |

Question on isomorphism between addition and multiplication | Nov 27, 2012 |

Addition and multiplication in Z/nZ | Oct 16, 2011 |

Multiplicativity/Additivity and homomorphisms | Oct 21, 2007 |

Multiplication=addition 2*2=2+2=4 | Feb 12, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**