Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Multiplicative and additive identities as successors

  1. Jul 2, 2012 #1
    Fact: The ring of integers Z is totally ordered: for any distinct elements a and b in Z, either a>b or a<b.

    Fact: The ring of integers is discrete, in the sense that for any element a in Z, there exists an element b in Z such that there is no element c in Z with a<c<b, and the same argument holds with the greater than signs flipped. In other words, successors and predecessors exist in Z (but not in R, for example).

    Observation: In Z, the multiplicative identity 1 is the successor of the additive identity 0.

    Questions: Is this fact a coincidence? Does this have any significance? Must the multiplicative identity always succeed the additive identity in rings that have the same properties as Z, assuming there are any other?
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted