Munkres' Topology: 2nd Edition Spine Misprint?

  • Thread starter Thread starter altcmdesc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Munkres Topology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a discrepancy on the spine of the second edition of a book, where one user notes that their copy states "Secon Edition" instead of "Second Edition." They inquire whether this error is present in all copies of the second edition or if it varies by printing. Participants in the thread are encouraged to share their own copies to determine the prevalence of this typographical error. The conversation highlights concerns about potential variations in printings and the accuracy of published materials.
altcmdesc
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I have no idea where else to ask this:

I have the 2nd edition of the book and I noticed that on the spine of the book it says "Secon Edition" instead of "Second". I'm just wondering if this is on every copy of the second edition of the book? Or, is your copy like this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mine says "Second"!
 
Maybe they're different printings.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top