Mutilple beam reflection question in Fabry-Perot cavity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of multiple beam reflections in a Fabry-Perot interferometer, specifically addressing the challenge of incorporating the number of reflections (N) into the final power density ratio. The derived equations include the electric amplitude of reflected waves, represented as EN = A·τ·ρ'N·ei(ωt-Nδ), and the power density ratio Sc/S = (nf·τ²)/(n·(1-sqrt(R))²·(1+C·sin²(δ/2)), where C is defined as 4·sqrt(R)/(1-sqrt(R))². The geometric series used in the derivation assumes an infinite number of reflections, which is crucial for understanding the behavior of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fabry-Perot interferometers
  • Familiarity with Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients
  • Knowledge of geometric series in optics
  • Basic principles of wave interference and amplitude calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geometric series in optics, particularly in the context of Fabry-Perot cavities
  • Explore the Optics textbook by Hecht and Zajac for detailed explanations and algebraic derivations
  • Investigate the effects of varying reflectance (R) on the performance of Fabry-Perot interferometers
  • Learn about the implications of finite versus infinite reflections in optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists working with interferometry, and anyone studying wave behavior in optical cavities will benefit from this discussion.

anthony27149
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Just having some trouble with a question about Fabry-Perot intereferometers. Here's the question:

a) Consider a beam of light undergoing multiple reflections in a Fabry-Perot cavity between two surfaces, both with reflectance R, and with no absorption.

Homework Equations


5CCQIjE.png


The Attempt at a Solution



So my problem is incorporating N into my final answer. I've derived a general equation of the electric amplitude of the reflected waves inside the cavity (as shown in this diagram), which I found to be:

EN = A·τ·ρ'N·ei(ωt-Nδ),

where ρ is the Fresnel reflection coefficient and τ is the transmission coefficient [Not sure if the equation is entirely correct]

And by geometric series:

Ec = A·τ·ei·ω·t/(1-sqrt(R)·e-iδ)

Using a power density function for both inside the cavity Sc and the original beam S:

Sc = 1/2·nf·c·ε(Ec*·Ec),

where E* is a complex conjugate

S = 1/2·n·c·ε·A2

I get: Sc/S = (nf·τ2 )/(n·(1-sqrt(R))2 ·(1+C·sin2 (δ/2))),

where C is 4·sqrt(R)/(1-sqrt(R))2

So, as you can see, this ratio doesn't have the number of reflections N, and I'm not sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anthony27149 said:

Homework Statement


Just having some trouble with a question about Fabry-Perot intereferometers. Here's the question:

a) Consider a beam of light undergoing multiple reflections in a Fabry-Perot cavity between two surfaces, both with reflectance R, and with no absorption.

Homework Equations


5CCQIjE.png


The Attempt at a Solution



So my problem is incorporating N into my final answer. I've derived a general equation of the electric amplitude of the reflected waves inside the cavity (as shown in this diagram), which I found to be:

EN = A·τ·ρ'N·ei(ωt-Nδ),

where ρ is the Fresnel reflection coefficient and τ is the transmission coefficient [Not sure if the equation is entirely correct]

And by geometric series:

Ec = A·τ·ei·ω·t/(1-sqrt(R)·e-iδ)

Using a power density function for both inside the cavity Sc and the original beam S:

Sc = 1/2·nf·c·ε(Ec*·Ec),

where E* is a complex conjugate

S = 1/2·n·c·ε·A2

I get: Sc/S = (nf·τ2 )/(n·(1-sqrt(R))2 ·(1+C·sin2 (δ/2))),

where C is 4·sqrt(R)/(1-sqrt(R))2

So, as you can see, this ratio doesn't have the number of reflections N, and I'm not sure where to go from here.
The (sum of the ) geometric series that you (correctly) used assumes an infinite number of reflections, of which the E amplitude for the Nth reflection contributing to the sum gets smaller and smaller. The derivation for this can also be found in the Optics Textbook by Hecht and Zajac if you wish to check your algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K